首页> 外文期刊>PharmacoEconomics >Hospital reimbursement price cap for cancer drugs: The french experience in controlling hospital drug expenditures
【24h】

Hospital reimbursement price cap for cancer drugs: The french experience in controlling hospital drug expenditures

机译:癌症药物的医院报销价格上限:法国控制医院药物支出的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2005, the French Government implemented a new way of financing high-cost drugs for hospitals in order to promote innovation. Such drugs are gathered on a positive list, established by the Ministry of Health, with a reimbursement price cap. Hospitals still negotiate with pharmaceutical firms, who set their prices freely, and then charge the national health insurance according to their consumption, without budgetary constraints, but on the condition of good use of care. They are not allowed to charge a price higher than this ceiling price, which is called the 'responsibility tariff' (RT). This measure is included in another, larger reform, which concerns hospital financing through allotted amounts at a specific diagnosis-based level. The purpose of this add-on payment on top of the health funds is firstly to avoid heterogeneity in costs per diagnostic-related group and secondly to avoid an uncontrolled increase of prices due to a lack of interest in negotiation from hospitals, as supplementary funding could reduce hospital price sensitivity. Objectives: The aim of this work was to assess the bargaining power of hospitals with the pharmaceutical firms in the monopoly market of innovative cancer drugs since the implementation of this reimbursement price cap. Methods: This study used data from the French Technical Agency of Information on Hospitals (ATIH; Agence Technique de l'Information sur l'Hospitalisation) and included 487 hospitals, which were public and non-profit private. The analysis was conducted on the cancer drugs of the regulated list. An index representing the ratio of the purchase prices to the RT was built from 2004 to 2007 in order to make a 'beforeα;ndα; fter' comparison. Results: Results showed a transient price decrease in 2005 before an alignment of patented drugs with regulated prices in the context of a dynamic market with a 22.5% yearly growth rate in value between 2004 and 2007.Conclusion: Hospitals are able to impose the RT for single-brand drugs. However, they are no longer able to negotiate below the RT except for generic drugs. Negotiations take place upstream for setting the RT between the public authorities and the firms. Adis
机译:2005年,法国政府实施了一种新的为医院购买高价药品的方式,以促进创新。此类药物被收集在卫生部制定的肯定清单上,并有报销价格上限。医院仍在与制药公司进行谈判,后者自由地设定价格,然后根据其消费量收取国民健康保险,没有预算限制,但要有良好的护理条件。他们不得收取高于此最高价格的价格,这就是所谓的“责任关税”(RT)。这项措施包含在另一项较大的改革中,该改革涉及在特定的基于诊断的级别上通过分配的金额为医院提供资金。在卫生基金之上进行这种附加支付的目的首先是为了避免每个诊断相关组的成本差异,其次是避免由于缺乏对医院谈判的兴趣而导致价格不受控制的上涨,因为补充资金可以降低医院价格敏感性。目标:这项工作的目的是评估自从实施这一补偿价格上限以来,医院在创新癌症药物垄断市场中与制药公司的议价能力。方法:本研究使用了法国医院信息技术机构(ATIH;医院信息化技术)的数据,包括487家公立和非营利性私立医院。对受管制名单中的癌症药物进行了分析。从2004年到2007年建立了一个表示购买价格与RT的比率的指数,以得出“beforeα;ndα;比较之后。结果:结果显示2005年价格出现短暂下跌,然后在2004年至2007年间市场价值每年以22.5%的年增长率增长的动态市场背景下,将专利药品与受监管价格调整一致。单品牌药物。但是,除了仿制药之外,他们再也无法在RT以下进行谈判。在上游进行谈判,以设定公共机构和企业之间的RT。阿迪斯

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号