...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical magazine: structure and properties of condensed matter >On the measurement of yield strength by spherical indentation
【24h】

On the measurement of yield strength by spherical indentation

机译:用球形压痕法测量屈服强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Over the past 10 years, a number of investigators have proposed methods to measure the yield strength of metals using instrumented indentation experiments performed with a sphere [Ma et al., J. Appl. Phys. 94 288 (2003); Cao and Lu, Acta Mater. 52 4023 (2004); Yu and Blanchard, J. Mater. Res. 11 2358 (1996); Field and Swain, J. Mater. Res. 10 101 (1995)]. Most of these proposed methods have yet to be rigorously verified experimentally. The objective of this work is to contribute to experimental verification by testing four contemporary models against their ability to accurately determine the yield strength of the aluminium alloy 6061-T6 using the smallest sphere commercially available. The four models selected for this review are those in the references mentioned above. The tensile and indentation samples were taken from the same 3.175-mm thick sheet and the surface of the indentation sample was given the best possible mechanical polishing. The indentation experiments were performed using a 90 degrees diamond cone with a mechanically polished radius of 385 nm. The procedures proposed by Ma et al. and Cao and Lu were inconsistent with experimental observations and could not be implemented. Yu and Blanchard's model overestimated the yield strength by approximately 55%. Field and Swain's procedure overestimated the tensile flow curve by roughly 40%, which precluded obtaining a meaningful estimate of the yield strength. Among the most likely explanations for these surprisingly poor results are the effects of roughness and contaminants on the surface, and the possibility of an indentation size effect.
机译:在过去的十年中,许多研究人员提出了使用球体进行的压痕实验来测量金属的屈服强度的方法[Ma et al。,J. Appl。物理94288(2003);曹和路,Acta Mater。 52 4023(2004); Yu和Blanchard,J。Mater。 Res。 11 2358(1996); Field and Swain,J。Mater。 Res。 10 101(1995)]。这些提议的方法大多数尚未经过实验严格验证。这项工作的目的是通过测试四种现代模型是否具有使用市售的最小球体准确确定铝合金6061-T6的屈服强度的能力,从而为实验验证做出贡献。为本次审查选择的四个模型是上述参考文献中的模型。拉伸和压痕样品取自相同的3.175毫米厚的薄板,并且压痕样品的表面经过了尽可能最佳的机械抛光。压痕实验是使用90度菱形锥和机械抛光半径385 nm进行的。 Ma等人提出的程序。曹和卢与实验观察结果不一致,无法执行。 Yu和Blanchard的模型高估了屈服强度约55%。 Field和Swain的程序高估了拉伸流动曲线约40%,因此无法获得有意义的屈服强度估计。这些令人惊讶的不良结果的最可能解释是表面粗糙度和污染物的影响,以及压痕尺寸影响的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号