首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology: PPP >Answering the Neo-Szaszian Critique: Are Cluster B Personality Disorders Really So Different?
【24h】

Answering the Neo-Szaszian Critique: Are Cluster B Personality Disorders Really So Different?

机译:回答新撒萨人的批判:群体B的人格障碍真的那么不同吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

I was delighted to be asked to comment on Peter Zachar's paper, partly because he presents an elegant proposal for how personality disorders (PD) might be considered to fit into a broadly medical conception of disorder, but also because the overlap between moral and clinical elements of disorder, and more broadly moral and clinical psychiatric kinds, seems to me to be a question central to the theory and practice of psychiatry. The moral context of diagnosis and treatment is a question not just in the PD field (Pearce and Pickard 2009, 2010). The fact that over half of prisoners in the United Kingdom have a PD and a similar number can be diagnosed with a neurotic disorder (Singleton, Meltzer, and Gatward 1998) should itself challenge the way we tend to consider the categories of moral and clinical separately.
机译:我很高兴被要求对彼得·扎查尔的论文发表评论,部分是因为他提出了一个优雅的建议,即人格障碍(PD)如何被认为适合广泛的医学上的障碍概念,还因为道德和临床因素之间存在重叠在我看来,对精神障碍的理解,以及更广泛的道德和临床精神病学问题,是精神病学理论和实践的核心问题。诊断和治疗的道德背景不仅是局部放电领域的问题(Pearce和Pickard 2009,2010)。英国超过半数的囚犯患有PD,并且可以诊断出类似数量的神经症(Singleton,Meltzer和Gatward,1998年),这一事实本身应该挑战我们倾向于分别考虑道德和临床类别的方式。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号