首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >Evaluating and comparing algorithms for respiratory motion prediction
【24h】

Evaluating and comparing algorithms for respiratory motion prediction

机译:评估和比较呼吸运动预测算法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In robotic radiosurgery, it is necessary to compensate for systematic latencies arising from target tracking and mechanical constraints. This compensation is usually achieved by means of an algorithm which computes the future target position. In most scientific works on respiratory motion prediction, only one or two algorithms are evaluated on a limited amount of very short motion traces. The purpose of this work is to gain more insight into the real world capabilities of respiratory motion prediction methods by evaluating many algorithms on an unprecedented amount of data. We have evaluated six algorithms, the normalized least mean squares (nLMS), recursive least squares (RLS), multi-step linear methods (MULIN), wavelet-based multiscale autoregression (wLMS), extended Kalman filtering, and ε-support vector regression (SVRpred) methods, on an extensive database of 304 respiratory motion traces. The traces were collected during treatment with the CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and feature an average length of 71 min. Evaluation was done using a graphical prediction toolkit, which is available to the general public, as is the data we used. The experiments show that the nLMS algorithm - which is one of the algorithms currently used in the CyberKnife - is outperformed by all other methods. This is especially true in the case of the wLMS, the SVRpred, and the MULIN algorithms, which perform much better. The nLMS algorithm produces a relative root mean square (RMS) error of 75% or less (i.e., a reduction in error of 25% or more when compared to not doing prediction) in only 38% of the test cases, whereas the MULIN and SVRpred methods reach this level in more than 77%, the wLMS algorithm in more than 84% of the test cases. Our work shows that the wLMS algorithm is the most accurate algorithm and does not require parameter tuning, making it an ideal candidate for clinical implementation. Additionally, we have seen that the structure of a patient's respiratory motion trace has strong influence on the outcome of prediction. Further work is needed to determine a priori the suitability of an individual's respiratory behaviour to motion prediction.
机译:在机器人放射外科中,有必要补偿由于目标跟踪和机械约束而引起的系统延迟。通常通过计算未来目标位置的算法来实现这种补偿。在大多数有关呼吸运动预测的科学著作中,仅在有限数量的非常短的运动轨迹上评估一种或两种算法。这项工作的目的是通过对前所未有的数据量评估许多算法,以更深入地了解呼吸运动预测方法的真实功能。我们评估了六种算法,归一化最小均方(nLMS),递归最小二乘(RLS),多步线性方法(MULIN),基于小波的多尺度自回归(wLMS),扩展卡尔曼滤波和ε支持向量回归(SVRpred)方法,包含304个呼吸运动轨迹的广泛数据库。痕迹是在使用射波刀(Accuray,Inc.,Sunnyvale,CA,USA)处理期间收集的,平均长度为71分钟。评估是使用图形化预测工具包进行的,我们使用的数据也可供公众使用。实验表明,nLMS算法(目前在“射波刀”中使用的算法之一)在所有其他方法上均表现出色。在wLMS,SVRpred和MULIN算法的情况下尤其如此,它们的性能要好得多。 nLMS算法仅在38%的测试案例中产生了75%或更低的相对均方根(RMS)误差(即,与不进行预测相比,误差降低了25%或更多),而MULIN和SVRpred方法在超过77%的测试案例中达到了这一水平,而wLMS算法在84%以上的测试用例中达到了这一水平。我们的工作表明,wLMS算法是最准确的算法,不需要参数调整,使其成为临床实施的理想选择。此外,我们已经看到患者呼吸运动轨迹的结构对预测结果有很大影响。需要进一步的工作来确定个人的呼吸行为对运动预测的适合性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号