...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior >The anxiogenic-like and anxiolytic-like effects of MDMA on mice in the elevated plus-maze: a comparison with amphetamine.
【24h】

The anxiogenic-like and anxiolytic-like effects of MDMA on mice in the elevated plus-maze: a comparison with amphetamine.

机译:MDMA对高架迷宫中小鼠的抗焦虑和抗焦虑作用:与苯丙胺的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many abused substances have been found to possess anxiogenic-like or/and anxiolytic-like properties. Discrepancies about the effects of MDMA, one of the most popular recreational drugs in recent years, on anxiety have been seen in the literature, and almost all of the data in this respect were derived from retrospective studies. The present study was thus designed to examine the drug's actions by using an animal model of anxiety, the elevated plus-maze test in male mice. Intraperitoneal MDMA at 1 mg/kg was ineffective, at 4 mg/kg decreased the percent of open arm entries (p < 0.01), and increased enclosed entries (p < 0.05), at 12 mg/kg had no significant effect, and at 20 mg/kg induced an increase of percent of open time (p < 0.01). As control drugs, amphetamine (0.5-4 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a dose-dependent, anxiogenic-like effect and diazepam (1 mg/kg, i.p.) induced an anxiolytic-like effect in the test. The results indicate that MDMA has anxiogenic-like properties at lower doses and anxiolytic-like at higher doses. The effects of MDMA and amphetamine on the mouse's responses to the plus-maze are compared. These findings provide a possible explanation for the controversies over MDMA's effects on anxiety in the literature.
机译:已经发现许多滥用物质具有类似焦虑发生或/和抗焦虑的特性。在文献中已经发现了有关近几年最流行的休闲药物之一摇头丸对焦虑的影响的差异,这方面的几乎所有数据都来自回顾性研究。因此,本研究旨在通过使用焦虑症动物模型(雄性小鼠中升高的迷宫测试)来检查药物的作用。 1 mg / kg的腹膜内MDMA无效,4 mg / kg时,张开臂进入的百分比降低(p <0.01),封闭的条目增加(p <0.05),在12 mg / kg时无明显作用, 20 mg / kg导致打开时间百分比增加(p <0.01)。作为对照药物,苯丙胺(0.5-4 mg / kg,腹膜内)产生剂量依赖性的类似焦虑症的作用,而地西((1 mg / kg,i.p.)在试验中引起抗焦虑样的作用。结果表明,MDMA在较低剂量下具有类似焦虑的性质,在较高剂量下具有类似抗焦虑的性质。比较了摇头丸和苯丙胺对小鼠对正迷宫反应的影响。这些发现为文献中有关MDMA对焦虑的影响之争提供了可能的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号