首页> 外文期刊>Petroleum Review >To forfeit or not?
【24h】

To forfeit or not?

机译:没钱了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Defaults under oil and gas joint operating agreements (JOAs) - in particular, failures to pay cash calls - have been rife as a result of the recent oil price decline, leading to the inevitable question: 'Is the best solution to forfeit the defaulting party's interest?' From a legal viewpoint, the enforceability of JOA forfeiture clauses will be of paramount importance when weighing up the pros and cons of forfeiture. Traditionally, since forfeiture clauses require the defaulting party's interest in the joint venture to be transferred to the non-defaulting parties without compensation, they have risked falling foul of the English law rule against penalties. The Penalty Rule prevents the enforcement of a remedy for breach of contract which acts as a penalty against the defaulting party.
机译:石油和天然气联合经营协议(JOA)下的违约-特别是未能支付现金催款-​​由于最近的石油价格下跌而到处泛滥,导致不可避免的问题:“这是放弃违约方的最佳解决方案”利益?'从法律角度来看,在权衡没收利弊时,JOA没收条款的可执行性至关重要。传统上,由于没收条款要求违约方在合营企业中的权益无偿转让给非违约方,因此,它们冒着违反英国法律规定的罚款的风险。 《刑罚规则》防止对违反合同的行为执行补救措施,这是对违约方的一种惩罚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号