...
首页> 外文期刊>Perfusion >Point of care hematocrit and hemoglobin in cardiac surgery: a review.
【24h】

Point of care hematocrit and hemoglobin in cardiac surgery: a review.

机译:心脏手术中血细胞比容和血红蛋白的护理要点:综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of point-of-care blood gas analyzers in cardiac surgery has been on the increase over the past decade. The availability of these analyzers in the operating room and post-operative intensive care units eliminates the time delays to transport samples to the main laboratory and reduces the amount of blood sampled to measure such parameters as electrolytes, blood gases, lactates, glucose and hemoglobin/hematocrit. Point-of-care analyzers also lead to faster and more reliable clinical decisions while the patient is still on the heart lung machine. Point-of-care devices were designed to provide safe, appropriate and consistent care of those patients in need of rapid acid/base balance and electrolyte management in the clinical setting. As a result, clinicians rely on their values to make decisions regarding ventilation, acid/base management, transfusion and glucose management. Therefore, accuracy and reliability are an absolute must for these bedside analyzers in both the cardiac operating room and the post-op intensive care units. Clinicians have a choice of two types of technology to measure hemoglobin/hematocrit during bypass, which subsequently determines their patient's level of hemodilution, as well as their transfusion threshold. All modern point-of-care blood gas analyzers measure hematocrit using a technology called conductivity, while other similar devices measure hemoglobin using a technology called co-oximetry. The two methods are analyzed and compared in this review. The literature indicates that using conductivity to measure hematocrit during and after cardiac surgery could produce inaccurate results when hematocrits are less than 30%, and, therefore, result in unnecessary homologous red cell transfusions in some patients. These inaccuracies are influenced by several factors that are common and unique to cardiopulmonary bypass, and will also be reviewed here. It appears that the only accurate, consistent and reliable method to determine hemodilution and establish transfusion thresholds based on nadir hematocrits during cardiopulmonary bypass, and immediately post cardiac surgery, is with the use of co-oximetry.
机译:在过去的十年中,在心脏外科手术中使用即时医疗血气分析仪的人数一直在增加。这些分析仪在手术室和术后重症监护室中的可用性消除了将样品运送到主要实验室的时间延迟,并减少了用于测量电解质,血液气体,乳酸,葡萄糖和血红蛋白/分血器。即时医疗分析仪还可以在患者仍在心肺机上时做出更快,更可靠的临床决策。护理点设备旨在为临床环境中需要快速酸/碱平衡和电解质管理的那些患者提供安全,适当和一致的护理。结果,临床医生依靠他们的价值观来做出有关通气,酸/碱管理,输血和葡萄糖管理的决策。因此,对于心脏手术室和术后重症监护室中的这些床旁分析仪而言,准确性和可靠性是绝对必要的。临床医生可以选择两种技术来测量旁路过程中的血红蛋白/血细胞比容,这些技术随后可以确定患者的血液稀释水平以及输血阈值。所有现代的即时医疗血气分析仪都使用一种称为电导率的技术来测量血细胞比容,而其他类似设备则使用一种称为共血氧测定法的技术来测量血红蛋白。本文对这两种方法进行了分析和比较。文献表明,在心脏手术期间和之后使用电导率测量血细胞比容可能会在血细胞比容低于30%时产生不准确的结果,因此,在某些患者中会导致不必要的同源红细胞输血。这些不准确度受心肺旁路手术常见且独特的几个因素的影响,也将在此处进行回顾。似乎唯一的准确,一致和可靠的方法是在心肺转流期间以及在心脏手术后立即根据天底血细胞比容确定血液稀释度并确定输血阈值,这就是使用共氧测定法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号