首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >Can Sex Differences in Science Be Tied to the Long Reach of Prenatal Hormones? Brain Organization Theory, Digit Ratio (2D/4D), and Sex Differences in Preferences and Cognition
【24h】

Can Sex Differences in Science Be Tied to the Long Reach of Prenatal Hormones? Brain Organization Theory, Digit Ratio (2D/4D), and Sex Differences in Preferences and Cognition

机译:科学中的性别差异能否与产前激素的长期获取联系起来?脑组织理论,数字比率(2D / 4D)以及偏好和认知中的性别差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Brain organization theory posits a cascade of physiological and behavioral changes initiated and shaped by prenatal hormones. Recently, this theory has been associated with outcomes including gendered toy preference, 2D/4D digit ratio, personality characteristics, sexual orientation, and cognitive profile (spatial, verbal, and mathematical abilities). We examine the evidence for this claim, focusing on 2D/4D and its putative role as a biomarker for organizational features that influence cognitive abilities/interests predisposing males toward mathematically and spatially intensive careers. Although massive support exists for early brain organization theory overall, there are myriad inconsistencies, alternative explanations, and outright contradictions that must be addressed while still taking the entire theory into account. Like a fractal within the larger theory, the 2D/4D hypothesis mirrors this overall support on a smaller scale while likewise suffering from inconsistencies (positive, negative, and sex-dependent correlations), alternative explanations (2D/4D related to spatial preferences rather than abilities per se), and contradictions (feminine 2D/4D in men associated with higher spatial ability). Using the debate over brain organization theory as the theoretical stage, we focus on 2D/4D evidence as an increasingly important player on this stage, a demonstrative case in point of the evidential complexities of the broader debate, and an increasingly important topic in its own right.
机译:脑组织理论提出了由产前激素引发和塑造的一系列生理和行为变化。最近,该理论与包括性别玩具偏好,2D / 4D手指比例,个性特征,性取向和认知特征(空间,语言和数学能力)在内的结果相关联。我们研究了这一主张的证据,重点关注2D / 4D及其作为组织特征生物标志物的推定作用,这些特征影响认知能力/兴趣,使男性更容易从事数学和空间密集的职业。尽管总体上对早期的大脑组织理论存在着巨大的支持,但是在仍然要考虑整个理论的同时,仍然存在许多矛盾之处,替代性解释和彻底的矛盾。就像较大理论中的分形一样,2D / 4D假设在较小的规模上反映了这种总体支持,同时也遭受了不一致(正相关,负相关和性别相关),替代性解释(2D / 4D与空间偏好有关,而不是与空间偏好有关)本身的能力)和矛盾(男性具有较高空间能力的女性2D / 4D)。使用关于脑组织理论的辩论作为理论阶段,我们将重点放在2D / 4D证据上,作为该阶段越来越重要的参与者,这是更广泛辩论的证据复杂性的示范案例,而其本身也越来越重要对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号