...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric emergency care >Evaluation and management of sexually transmitted infections in adolescent males presenting to a pediatric emergency department: is the chief complaint diagnostic?
【24h】

Evaluation and management of sexually transmitted infections in adolescent males presenting to a pediatric emergency department: is the chief complaint diagnostic?

机译:评估和处理在儿科急诊科就诊的青春期男性性传播感染:主要投诉是否可诊断?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to (1) describe evaluation and treatment patterns for adolescent males presenting with a concern for sexually transmitted infection (STI) in a pediatric emergency department, (2) assess the rates of STIs in symptomatic males, and (3) determine the utility of urinalysis alone in predicting STIs in adolescent males. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients presenting to our pediatric emergency department from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2007. Inclusion criteria included males, aged 15 to 21 years, with an STI or urinary chief complaint. Exclusion criteria were referrals from pediatricians, a previous history of urinary tract infection or preexisting urologic condition, or primary complaint of scrotal and/or testicular pain. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were identified. Testing included urinalysis with microscopy (UA) (64%), urine culture (53%), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) (93%), and Trichomonas vaginalis (5%). Sixty-four percent of males tested positive for either GC or CT, or both. Overall, 91% of patients were treated for CT and GC, 18% for T. vaginalis, and 5% for urinary tract infection. The sensitivity and specificity of a positive UA for presence of GC and/or CT were 86% and 82%, respectively, whereas the positive and negative predictive values were 89% and 77%, respectively. There were no positive urine cultures in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four percent of patients were diagnosed with either GC or CT. Although UA is helpful in predicting STI, limited use is warranted, given the high prevalence of disease in this selected population. The urine culture does not appear to be a necessary adjunct in the management of these patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是(1)描述在儿科急诊科中对性传播感染(STI)表示关注的青春期男性的评估和治疗方式,(2)评估有症状男性中性传播感染的发生率,以及(3)确定单独的尿液分析在预测青春期男性性传播感染中的效用。方法:对2007年1月1日至2007年12月31日就诊于我们儿科急诊科的所有患者进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入标准包括15至21岁的男性,性传播感染或尿毒症主诉。排除标准是儿科医生的转诊,先前的尿路感染史或泌尿系统疾病史,或阴囊和/或睾丸疼痛的主诉。结果:总共鉴定出270例患者。测试包括显微镜检查(UA)(64%),尿培养物(53%),淋病奈瑟氏菌(GC)和沙眼衣原体(CT)(93%)和阴道毛滴虫(5%)的尿液分析。 64%的男性的GC或CT或两者均呈阳性。总体而言,91%的患者接受了CT和GC治疗,18%的阴道T.和5%的患者接受了尿路感染。阳性UA对GC和/或CT的敏感性和特异性分别为86%和82%,而阳性和阴性预测值分别为89%和77%。队列中没有阳性尿培养。结论:有64%的患者被诊断患有GC或CT。尽管UA有助于预测性传播感染,但鉴于所选人群中疾病的高发率,因此应限制使用。在这些患者的治疗中,尿液培养似乎不是必需的辅助手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号