...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric emergency care >The effect of diagnosis-specific computerized discharge instructions on 72-hour return visits to the pediatric emergency department.
【24h】

The effect of diagnosis-specific computerized discharge instructions on 72-hour return visits to the pediatric emergency department.

机译:诊断专用的计算机出院说明对小儿急诊科72小时回诊的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The number of patients returning to the pediatric emergency department (PED) within 72 hours of discharge is frequently cited as a benchmark for quality patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the introduction of diagnosis-specific computer-generated discharge instructions would decrease the number of medically unnecessary return visits to the PED. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who returned to the PED within 72 hours of discharge was performed. Charts were reviewed from 2 comparable periods: September 2004 to February 2005, when handwritten discharge instructions were issued to each patient, and September 2005 to February 2006, when each patient received computer-generated diagnosis-specific discharge instructions. The patient's age, primary care provider, insurance status, chief complaint, vital signs, history, physical examination, plan of care, and diagnosis at each visit were recorded. Cases were excluded if the patient left against medical advice or without being seen, was admitted to the hospital on the first visit, or had incomplete or missing records. The medical necessity of the return visit was rated as "yes," "no," or "indeterminate" based on review of the visit noting reason for return, history and physical examination, diagnosis, and interventions or changes in the initial care plan. RESULTS: Of all return visits to the PED within 72 hours of discharge, 13% were deemed unnecessary for patients receiving handwritten instructions compared with 15% for patients receiving computer-generated instructions (P = 0.5, not significant). For each additional year of age, the return visit was 1.07 times as likely to be medically appropriate (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.12; P = 0.002). Patients who returned to the PED more than once were 2.69 times more likely to have a medically appropriate visit as were those with only 1 return visit (95% confidence interval, 0.95-7.58; P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Computer-generated diagnosis-specific discharge instructions do not decrease the number of medically unnecessary repeat visits to the PED.
机译:目的:经常将出院72小时内返回小儿急诊科(PED)的患者人数作为高质量患者护理的基准。这项研究的目的是确定引入诊断特定的计算机生成的出院说明是否会减少对PED进行医学上不必要的回诊的次数。方法:对出院72小时内返回PED的患者进行回顾性图表回顾。回顾了两个可比较时期的图表:2004年9月至2005年2月,向每位患者发布了手写出院说明; 2005年9月至2006年2月,当每位患者接受了计算机生成的特定于诊断的出院说明时。记录患者的年龄,初级保健提供者,保险状况,主要投诉,生命体征,病史,身体检查,护理计划和每次就诊诊断。如果患者在没有就医的情况下就诊或没有被看诊,在初次就诊时入院或病历不完整或缺失,则排除病例。回访的医疗必要性根据对回访的评论,包括回访的原因,病史和体格检查,诊断以及干预措施或初始护理计划的更改,被评定为“是”,“否”或“不确定”。结果:在出院72小时内对PED进行的所有回诊中,接受手写指令的患者中13%被认为是不必要的,而接受计算机生成指令的患者中15%被认为是不必要的(P = 0.5,不显着)。每增加一岁,回诊就诊的可能性为医学上合理的1.07倍(95%置信区间1.03-1.12; P = 0.002)。多次回访PED的患者进行医疗就诊的可能性是仅回诊一次的患者的2.69倍(95%置信区间,0.95-7.58; P = 0.062)。结论:计算机生成的特定于诊断的出院说明不会减少对PED进行医学上不必要的重复访问的次数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号