...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric exercise science >Assessing modes and frequency of commuting to school in youngsters: a systematic review.
【24h】

Assessing modes and frequency of commuting to school in youngsters: a systematic review.

机译:评估青少年通勤的方式和频率:系统的审查。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The first objective was to review and analyze self-reported measures used for assessing mode and frequency of commuting to and from school in youngsters (4-18.5 years old). The secondary objective was to conduct a qualitative appraisal of the identified studies. We searched five online databases: PubMed, SportDiscus, ProQuest, National Transportation Library, and Web of Knowledge. Four categories of search terms were identified: self-report, active transportation, school-aged children and school. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to determine whether the studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the reporting of the measures was assessed using a tailored list. The electronic search strategy produced 5,898 studies. After applying the inclusion criteria, we identified 158 studies. Sixty-three studies (39.8%) specified the question about modes of commuting to school. One hundred seven studies (67.7%) directly questioned the study subjects (i.e., children and/or adolescents). Twenty studies (12.7%) posed a valid and reliable question. The quality assessment of the self-report measures was medium. The self-report measures used in the literature for assessing commuting to school tend to be heterogeneous and make difficult interstudies comparisons. Therefore we put forward the idea of a standard question designed to elicit reliable, comparable information on commuting to school.
机译:第一个目标是审查和分析自我报告的措施,这些措施用于评估年轻人(4-18.5岁)上下学的方式和频率。次要目标是对已确定的研究进行定性评估。我们搜索了五个在线数据库:PubMed,SportDiscus,ProQuest,国家交通图书馆和Web of Knowledge。确定了四类搜索词:自我报告,主动交通,学龄儿童和学校。审查标题和摘要以确定研究是否符合纳入标准。使用量身定制的清单评估了措施报告的质量。电子搜索策略产生了5,898项研究。应用纳入标准后,我们​​确定了158项研究。六十三项研究(39.8%)提出了关于通勤方式的问题。一百零七项研究(67.7%)直接质疑了研究对象(即儿童和/或青少年)。二十项研究(12.7%)提出了一个有效而可靠的问题。自我报告措施的质量评估为中等。文献中用于评估上学通勤的自我报告方法往往是异类的,难以进行跨学科的比较。因此,我们提出了一个标准问题的想法,旨在引出可靠的,可比的通勤学校信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号