...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Research effort allocation and the conservation of restricted-range island bird species
【24h】

Research effort allocation and the conservation of restricted-range island bird species

机译:研究成果分配和保护范围有限的岛屿鸟类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Knowledge gap analyses can be useful to highlight imbalances in research and to improve the distribution of conservation research efforts. We used ISI's Web of Knowledge (WoK) and BirdLife International's library catalogue (BLI) to examine the allocation of research effort amongst the extinction-prone island restricted-range birds (RRSs, n =1321) and the island endemic bird areas and secondary areas (EBAs, n =108; SAs, n =58) previously identified by BirdLife International. We found that the distribution of research effort was very uneven across both species and areas. Half of the number of outputs obtained from WoK referred to 3.1% of the island restricted-range bird species and to 4.8% of the endemic bird areas and secondary areas, whereas 52.2% of the species and 34.3% of the areas had no output. The global distribution of research had a strong spatial component, with a limited number of places receiving most of the research efforts (Hawaii, New Zealand, Central America), while many species rich areas were very poorly studied (South East Asia, South Pacific, most Atlantic islands). Research amongst the most threatened RRSs tended to be less biased, with these species having a higher probability of having at least one output from WoK than less threatened species. Given that threats to the conservation of biodiversity are often highly context-dependent, we advocate prioriting the study of poorly known species and regions. Finally, we integrate the knowledge gaps we identify with previously established conservation priorities, in order to prioritize for future conservation research on RRS, EBAs and SAs.
机译:知识差距分析对于突出研究不平衡和改善保护性研究成果的分布非常有用。我们使用ISI的Web of Knowledge(WoK)和BirdLife International的图书馆目录(BLI)来研究易灭绝的岛屿限制范围鸟类(RRSs,n = 1321)以及岛屿特有鸟类区域和次要区域之间的研究工作分配(EBA,n = 108; SA,n = 58)之前由BirdLife International确定。我们发现,在物种和地区之间,研究工作的分布非常不均匀。从“世界知识”获得的产出数量的一半涉及该岛限定范围鸟类的3.1%,占特有鸟类区域和次要区域的4.8%,而52.2%的物种和34.3%的区域没有产出。研究的全球分布具有很强的空间成分,只有少数地方接受了大部分研究工作(夏威夷,新西兰,中美洲),而许多物种丰富的地区却研究得很差(东南亚,南太平洋,大多数大西洋岛屿)。在受威胁最大的RRS中,研究倾向于偏向较少,与受威胁较小的物种相比,这些物种具有至少一种来自WoK产出的可能性。鉴于对生物多样性保护的威胁通常高度依赖于上下文,因此我们主张优先研究鲜为人知的物种和地区。最后,我们将识别出的知识差距与先前确定的保护重点结合起来,以便优先考虑未来对RRS,EBA和SA的保护研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号