...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus arteriosus.
【24h】

Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus arteriosus.

机译:经导管线圈闭塞与孤立动脉导管未闭手术关闭之间的费用和临床结果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the cost (measured as resource utilization by the institution) and clinical effectiveness of transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure. Similar comparisons have been made previously with other devices no longer in use in the United States. No such comparison has been made for coil occlusion, which has been performed increasingly since 1992. METHODS: All patients who underwent either coil or surgical closure of uncomplicated PDA at our institution between August 1993 and June 1996 were retrospectively identified. Patients were included in the study if they were eligible for either closure technique. Thus, they had a restrictive PDA (not associated with pulmonary hypertension) and no overt evidence of congestive heart failure. Patients were excluded if they had other significant cardiac or noncardiac problems. Total procedural and recovery costs (including labor, material, equipment, and overhead) incurred by the provider were determined using a cost accounting system called Transition Systems, Inc. To define further how costs differed for the two techniques, total costs were subdivided into the categories of professional, technical, inpatient hospital stay, postprocedure testing, and supplies and other miscellaneous costs. PDA closure rates and associated complications also were compared. Follow-up information was sought from outpatient visits to our institution or by contacting the referring physicians. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were identified, 3 of whom were excluded because of coexisting medical problems. The study group consisted of 36 patients; 24 underwent PDA coil occlusion and 12 surgical closure. Mean age and weight were 8.8 years and 28.5 kg for the coil patients, and 7.3 years and 32.8 kg for the surgical patients. Median procedural duration was 150 minutes for the coil group and 165 minutes for the surgical group. The total cost to the institution of coil occlusion was significantly lower than that of surgical closure (
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较经导管线圈闭塞术和动脉导管未闭(PDA)封闭的费用(按机构的资源利用情况衡量)和临床有效性。先前已经与美国不再使用的其他设备进行了类似的比较。自1992年以来,对于线圈阻塞的比较还没有进行过比较。自1992年以来,我们对1993年8月至1996年6月间在无并发症PDA进行线圈或手术闭合的所有患者进行了回顾性鉴定。如果患者符合任一封闭技术的条件,则将其纳入研究。因此,他们有限制性PDA(与肺动脉高压无关),也没有明显的充血性心力衰竭证据。如果患者还有其他重大的心脏或非心脏问题,则排除在外。供应商产生的总过程和恢复成本(包括人工,材料,设备和管理费用)是使用称为Transition Systems,Inc.的成本会计系统确定的。要进一步定义这两种技术的成本差异,将总成本细分为专业,技术,住院住院,手术后测试以及用品和其他杂项类别。还比较了PDA的闭合率和相关并发症。随访信息来自门诊就诊或联系推荐医生。结果:共鉴定出39例患者,其中3例由于并存医疗问题而被排除在外。该研究组由36名患者组成。 24例行PDA线圈闭塞,12例行手术闭合。盘绕患者的平均年龄和体重为8.8岁和28.5 kg,外科手术患者的平均年龄和体重为7.3岁和32.8 kg。线圈组的中位手术时间为150分钟,而手术组的中位手术时间为165分钟。进行线圈闭塞的总费用明显低于手术闭合的费用(

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号