首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.
【24h】

Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.

机译:研究补偿和儿童同意行为的标准各不相同:比较了3个多中心儿科临床试验中69个机构审查委员会批准的知情许可和同意书的形式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare standards for compensation and child participant assent in informed permission, assent, and consent forms (IP-A-CFs) approved by 55 local institutional review boards (IRBs) reviewing 3 standardized multicenter research protocols. METHOD: Sixty-nine principal investigators participating in any of 3 national, multicenter clinical trials submitted standardized research protocols for their trials to their local IRBs for approval. Copies of the subsequently IRB-approved IP-A-CFs were then forwarded to an academic clinical research organization. This collection of IRB-approved forms allowed for a quasiexperimental retrospective evaluation of the variation in informed permission, assent, and consent standards operationalized by the local IRBs. RESULTS: Standards for compensation and child participant assent varied substantially across 69 IRB-approved IP-A-CFs. Among the 48 IP-A-CFs offering compensation, monetary compensation was offered by 33 as reimbursement for travel, parking, or food expenses, whereas monetary or material compensation was offered by 22 for subject inconvenience and by 13 for subject time. Compensation ranged widely within and across studies (study 1, Dollars 180-1425; study 2, Dollars 0-500; and study 3, Dollars 0-100). Regarding child participant assent, among the 57 IP-A-CFs that included a form of assent documentation, 33 included a line for assent on the informed permission or consent form, whereas 35 included a separate form written in simplified language. Of the IP-A-CFs that stipulated the documentation of assent, 31 specified > or =1 age ranges for obtaining assent. Informed permission or consent forms were addressed either to parents or child participants. CONCLUSION: In response to identical clinical trial protocols, local IRBs generate IP-A-CFs that vary considerably regarding compensation and child participant assent.
机译:目的:系统地比较由55个地方机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的对3种标准化多中心研究方案进行审查的知情许可,同意书和同意书(IP-A-CF)中的补偿标准和儿童参与者的标准。方法:参加3项国家级多中心临床试验中的任何一项的69名主要研究者向其当地IRB提交了标准化的研究方案以进行试验。随后将IRB批准的IP-A-CF的副本转发给学术临床研究组织。收集的IRB批准的表格可以对本地IRB实施的知情许可,同意和同意标准的变化进行准实验回顾性评估。结果:69个IRB批准的IP-A-CF的补偿和儿童参与者同意的标准差异很大。在提供补偿的48个IP-A-CF中,有33个提供了货币补偿,作为旅行,停车或伙食费用的报销,而对不便之处,有22个提供了货币或物质补偿,而给与时间的则为13个。在研究中和研究之间的补偿范围很广(研究1,180至1425美元;研究2,0至500美元;研究3,0至100美元)。关于儿童参与者的同意,在包括同意书形式的57个IP-A-CF中,有33个包括在知情许可或同意书上的同意行,而35个包括以简化语言写成的单独表格。在规定同意文件的IP-A-CF中,有31个指定的年龄范围≥1或= 1。知情同意书或同意书寄给父母或孩子参加者。结论:为响应相同的临床试验方案,本地IRB产生的IP-A-CF在补偿和儿童参加者同意方面差异很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号