首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Variation in Standards of Research Compensation and Child Assent Practices: A Comparison of 69 Institutional Review Board–Approved Informed Permission and Assent Forms for 3 Multicenter Pediatric Clinical Trials
【24h】

Variation in Standards of Research Compensation and Child Assent Practices: A Comparison of 69 Institutional Review Board–Approved Informed Permission and Assent Forms for 3 Multicenter Pediatric Clinical Trials

机译:研究补偿和儿童准入实践标准的差异:69个机构审查委员会批准的知情许可和3种多中心儿科临床试验的同意书形式的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. To systematically compare standards for compensation and child participant assent in informed permission, assent, and consent forms (IP-A-CFs) approved by 55 local institutional review boards (IRBs) reviewing 3 standardized multicenter research protocols.METHOD. Sixty-nine principal investigators participating in any of 3 national, multicenter clinical trials submitted standardized research protocols for their trials to their local IRBs for approval. Copies of the subsequently IRB-approved IP-A-CFs were then forwarded to an academic clinical research organization. This collection of IRB-approved forms allowed for a quasiexperimental retrospective evaluation of the variation in informed permission, assent, and consent standards operationalized by the local IRBs.RESULTS. Standards for compensation and child participant assent varied substantially across 69 IRB-approved IP-A-CFs. Among the 48 IP-A-CFs offering compensation, monetary compensation was offered by 33 as reimbursement for travel, parking, or food expenses, whereas monetary or material compensation was offered by 22 for subject inconvenience and by 13 for subject time. Compensation ranged widely within and across studies (study 1, $180–1425; study 2, $0–500; and study 3, $0–100). Regarding child participant assent, among the 57 IP-A-CFs that included a form of assent documentation, 33 included a line for assent on the informed permission or consent form, whereas 35 included a separate form written in simplified language. Of the IP-A-CFs that stipulated the documentation of assent, 31 specified ≥1 age ranges for obtaining assent. Informed permission or consent forms were addressed either to parents or child participants.CONCLUSION. In response to identical clinical trial protocols, local IRBs generate IP-A-CFs that vary considerably regarding compensation and child participant assent.
机译:目的。为了系统地比较由55个地方机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的对3种标准化多中心研究协议进行审查的知情许可,同意和同意书(IP-A-CF)的赔偿标准和儿童参与者的同意。参加3项国家多中心临床试验中的任何一项的69名主要研究者向其当地IRB提交了标准化的研究方案以供试验。随后将IRB批准的IP-A-CF的副本转发给学术临床研究组织。收集的IRB批准的表格可以对本地IRB实施的知情许可,同意和同意标准的变化进行准实验回顾性评估。在69个IRB批准的IP-A-CF中,补偿和儿童参与者同意的标准差异很大。在提供补偿的48个IP-A-CF中,有33个提供了货币补偿,作为旅行,停车或伙食费用的报销,而对不便之处,有22个提供了货币或物质补偿,而给与时间的则为13个。在研究中和研究之间的补偿范围很广(研究1,$ 180-1425;研究2,$ 0-500;研究3,$ 0-100)。关于儿童参加者的同意,在包括同意书形式的57个IP-A-CF中,有33个包括在知情许可或同意书上的同意行,而35个包括单独的用简化语言写成的表格。在规定同意文件的IP-A-CF中,有31个指定的≥1年龄段获得了同意。知情同意书或同意书已发给父母或孩子的参与者。为了响应相同的临床试验方案,本地IRB生成的IP-A-CF在补偿和儿童参与者同意方面差异很大。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号