...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Prolonged intravenous therapy versus early transition to oral antimicrobial therapy for acute osteomyelitis in children.
【24h】

Prolonged intravenous therapy versus early transition to oral antimicrobial therapy for acute osteomyelitis in children.

机译:对于儿童急性骨髓炎,延长静脉注射治疗与早期过渡到口服抗生素治疗相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Early transition from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy for acute osteomyelitis in children has been suggested as a safe and effective alternative to traditional prolonged intravenous therapy via central venous catheter, but no studies have directly compared these 2 treatment modalities. We sought to compare the effectiveness of early transition from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy versus prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of children with acute osteomyelitis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 2 months to 17 years diagnosed with acute osteomyelitis between 2000 and 2005 at 29 freestanding children's hospitals in the United States to confirm the extent of variation in the use of early transition to oral therapy. We used propensity scores to adjust for potential differences between children treated with prolonged intravenous therapy and logistic regression to model the association of outcome (treatment failure rates within 6 months of diagnosis) and difference in the mode of therapy within hospitals and across hospitals. RESULTS: Of the 1969 children who met inclusion criteria, 1021 received prolonged intravenous therapy and 948 received oral therapy. The use of prolonged intravenous therapy varied significantly across hospitals (10%-95%). The treatment failure rate was 5% (54 of 1021) in the prolonged intravenous therapy group and 4% (38 of 948) in the oral therapy group. There was no significant association between treatment failure and the mode of antimicrobial therapy. Thirty-five (3.4%) children in the prolonged intravenous therapy group were readmitted for a catheter-associated complication. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of acute osteomyelitis with early transition to oral therapy is not associated with a higher risk of treatment failures and avoids the risks of prolonged intravenous therapy through central venous catheters.
机译:目的:已建议早期对儿童急性骨髓炎从静脉使用抗菌药物过渡到口服抗菌药物治疗,是通过中心静脉导管进行传统延长静脉治疗的一种安全有效的替代方法,但尚无研究直接比较这两种治疗方式。我们试图比较从早期静脉注射过渡到口服抗菌治疗与长期静脉注射抗菌治疗对急性骨髓炎儿童的治疗效果。方法:我们在美国的29家独立儿童医院中对2000年至2005年诊断为急性骨髓炎的2个月至17岁的2个月至17岁的儿童进行了回顾性队列研究,以确认早期过渡到口服治疗的使用范围的变化。我们使用倾向评分来调整接受长期静脉治疗和logistic回归治疗的儿童之间的潜在差异,以模拟结局(诊断后6个月内的治疗失败率)与医院内和医院间治疗模式差异的关联。结果:在符合入选标准的1969名儿童中,有1021名接受了长期静脉治疗,而948名接受了口服治疗。在各医院中,延长静脉疗法的使用差异显着(10%-95%)。延长静脉治疗组的治疗失败率为5%(1021的54),而口服治疗组的治疗失败率为4%(948的38)。治疗失败与抗菌治疗模式之间没有显着关联。延长静脉治疗组的35名(3.4%)儿童因导管相关并发症而重新入院。结论:早期过渡到口服治疗急性骨髓炎与较高的治疗失败风险无关,并且避免了通过中央静脉导管进行长期静脉治疗的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号