...
首页> 外文期刊>Performance measurement and metrics: The international journal for library and information services >LibQual+~(TM) in Lilliput: assessment benefits for small academic libraries
【24h】

LibQual+~(TM) in Lilliput: assessment benefits for small academic libraries

机译:利利普特的LibQual +〜(TM):小型学术图书馆的评估收益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe how small, academic libraries may realize significant benefits from employing LibQual+TM as an assessment of customer needs and expectations, stressing that these benefits may vary by the actual size of the institution. Design/methodology/approach – Catawba College compared its experience utilizing LibQual+TM with that of Washburn University, reported by Dole as a small, academic library application of the survey. Catawba College is a private, liberal arts college that is much smaller than Washburn, with one-quarter the student body and faculty. This paper examines the assessment experience of the two small institutions and compares the different advantages and disadvantages of using LibQual+TM within these two different types of small, academic institutions. Findings – The study found that a larger response rate was realized than that of the larger of the two institutions, especially by faculty, and suggests that this is due to the nature of the small colleges where faculty and student body are more familial. The paper also describes LibQual+TM as a type of “turn-key” survey process that is advantageous for small libraries with limited resources.Originality/value – This paper provides new information on the value of LibQual+TM for assessment in small, academic institutions and describes the benefits of this assessment tool for libraries in much smaller settings.
机译:目的–本文的目的是描述通过使用LibQual + TM评估客户需求和期望,大学图书馆可以实现多大的收益,并强调这些收益可能随机构的实际规模而变化。设计/方法论/方法–卡托巴学院(Catawba College)将其利用LibQual + TM的经验与沃什伯恩大学(Washburn University)的经验进行了比较,Dole将其作为调查的小型学术图书馆应用。卡托巴学院(Catawba College)是一所私立的人文学院,比华盛顿大学(Washburn)规模小得多,只有四分之一的学生和教师。本文考察了这两家小型机构的评估经验,并比较了在这两种不同类型的小型学术机构中使用LibQual + TM的优缺点。结果–研究发现,与两个机构中的较大机构相比,获得的回应率更高,尤其是在教职员工方面,这表明这是由于小型学院的性质所致,在该学院中,教职员工和学生群体较为家庭化。本文还将LibQual + TM描述为一种“交钥匙”调查过程,这对资源有限的小型图书馆是有利的。原创性/价值–本文提供了有关LibQual + TM的价值的新信息,供小型学术机构进行评估机构,并描述了此评估工具对小得多的图书馆的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号