首页> 外文学位 >Service quality in academic libraries: An analysis of LibQUAL+(TM) scores and institutional characteristics.
【24h】

Service quality in academic libraries: An analysis of LibQUAL+(TM) scores and institutional characteristics.

机译:高校图书馆的服务质量:LibQUAL +(TM)得分和机构特征的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This exploratory study considered the problem of assessing quality in academic libraries. The research question that framed the investigation asked whether service quality scores from the LibQUAL+(TM) instrument were related to the following college or university characteristics: institutional type, enrollment level, or the level of investment made in libraries. Data regarding Carnegie classification, FTE enrollment, and library expenditures were collected for 159 college and university libraries that participated in LibQUAL+(TM) during 2006. Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and regression analyses were calculated and the Bonferroni adjustment was applied to significance levels to compensate for errors caused by repeated calculations using the same data.;Several statistically significant relationships were found; notably, negative correlations were found between each of the LibQUAL+(TM) scores and total library expenditures. The study suggested that higher expectations among library users in large, research libraries led to slightly lower LibQUAL+(TM) scores. Implications for practice included that survey results should only be used as one component of an assessment strategy, and practitioners might consider the potential role of library marketing or public relations efforts to influence user expectations. Recommendations were made for future research including replicating some aspects of this study with a more representative sample, analyzing respondent comments as well as score data, and exploring whether there are reliable differences in results for different types of institutions or among groups of respondents (students and faculty, or faculty by discipline).
机译:这项探索性研究考虑了评估大学图书馆质量的问题。构成调查框架的研究问题询问,来自LibQUAL +(TM)仪器的服务质量得分是否与以下学院或大学的特征相关:机构类型,入学水平或对图书馆的投资水平。收集了2006年参与LibQUAL +(TM)的159家高校图书馆的卡内基分类,FTE入学和图书馆支出的数据。计算了描述性统计量,双变量相关性和回归分析,并将Bonferroni调整应用于显着性水平,补偿使用相同数据重复计算引起的误差。值得注意的是,在每个LibQUAL +(TM)得分与图书馆总支出之间都存在负相关关系。该研究表明,大型研究型图书馆的图书馆用户期望值较高,导致LibQUAL +(TM)得分略低。对实践的影响包括调查结果仅应用作评估策略的一个组成部分,从业人员可能会考虑图书馆营销或公共关系工作在影响用户期望方面的潜在作用。对未来的研究提出了建议,包括用更具代表性的样本复制本研究的某些方面,分析受访者的评论以及分数数据,并探讨不同类型的机构或受访者群体(学生和学生)的结果是否存在可靠的差异。或按学科划分的教师)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller, Kathleen F.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Central Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Central Florida.;
  • 学科 Library Science.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 121 p.
  • 总页数 121
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 图书馆学、图书馆事业;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号