首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >High-frequency oscillatory ventilation associated with inhaled nitric oxide compared to pressure-controlled assist/control ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide in children: Randomized, non-blinded, crossover study.
【24h】

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation associated with inhaled nitric oxide compared to pressure-controlled assist/control ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide in children: Randomized, non-blinded, crossover study.

机译:与儿童压力控制辅助/控制通气和一氧化氮吸入相关的高频振荡通气与吸入一氧化氮的相关性:随机,非盲交叉研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the acute oxygenation effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) plus inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) with pressure-controlled assist/control ventilation (PCACV) plus iNO in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) children. METHODS: Children with AHRF, aged between 1 month and 14 years under PCACV with PEEP >/= 10 cmH(2) O were randomly assigned to PCACV (PCVG, n = 14) or HFOV (HFVG, n = 14) in a crossover design. Oxygenation indexes and hemodynamic variables were recorded at enrollment (Tind), 1 hr after PCACV start (T0) and then every 4 hr (T4h, etc.). RESULTS: PO(2)/FiO(2) significantly increased after 4 hr compared to enrollment in both groups [(PCVG-Tind: 111.95 +/- 37 < T4h: 143.88 +/- 47.5 mmHg, P < 0.05; HFVG-Tind: 123.76 +/- 33 < T4h: 194.61 +/- 62.42 mmHg, P < 0.05)] without any statistical differences between groups. At T8h, PO(2)/FiO(2) was greater for HFVG compared with PCVG (HFVG: 227.9 +/- 80.7 > PCVG: 171.21 +/- 52.9 mmHg, P < 0.05). FiO(2) could be significantly reduced after 4 hr for HFVG (HFVG-T4h: 0.53 +/- 0.09 < Tind: 0.64 +/- 0.2; P < 0.05) but only after 8 hr for PCVG. Comparing groups at T8h, it was observed that FiO(2) decrease was greater for HFVG (HFVG: 0.47 +/- 0.06 < PCVG: 0.58 +/- 0.1; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both ventilatory techniques with iNO improve oxygenation. HFOV causes earlier FiO(2) reduction and increased PO(2)/FiO(2) ratio compared to PCACV at 8 hr. However, at the end of the protocol, there was no significant difference and no clinical improvement derived from the application of both ventilatory strategies with iNO. It is not possible to say what would have happened if a different conventional ventilatory mode and a fully protective ventilatory strategy had been used, given the fact that our study is non-blind, and that a limited number of patients were included in each group.
机译:目的:比较高频振荡通气(HFOV)联合吸入一氧化氮(iNO)与压力控制辅助/控制通气(PCACV)联合iNO在急性低氧血症性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)儿童中的急性氧合作用。方法:在PEAC> / = 10 cmH(2)O的PCACV下年龄在1个月至14岁之间的AHRF儿童在交叉试验中被随机分配为PCACV(PCVG,n = 14)或HFOV(HFVG,n = 14)设计。在入组时(Tind),开始PCACV后1小时(T0),然后每4小时(T4h等)记录氧合指数和血液动力学变量。结果:与入组相比,两组的PO(2)/ FiO(2)在4小时后均显着增加[(PCVG-Tind:111.95 +/- 37 PCVG:171.21 +/- 52.9 mmHg,P <0.05)。 FiO(2)可以在HFVG 4小时后显着降低(HFVG-T4h:0.53 +/- 0.09 <着色:0.64 +/- 0.2; P <0.05),但仅在PCVG 8小时后才能降低。在T8h比较组时,发现HFVG的FiO(2)下降更大(HFVG:0.47 +/- 0.06

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号