...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Influence of different methods of synchronized mechanical ventilation on ventilation, gas exchange, patient effort, and blood pressure fluctuations in premature neonates.
【24h】

Influence of different methods of synchronized mechanical ventilation on ventilation, gas exchange, patient effort, and blood pressure fluctuations in premature neonates.

机译:同步机械通气的不同方法对早产儿的通气,气体交换,患者的努力以及血压波动的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We studied the effects of two methods of synchronized mechanical ventilation [synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) and assist/control (A/C)] on ventilation, gas exchange, patient effort, and arterial blood pressure (ABP) fluctuations. SIMV and A/C were applied in random order in 12 preterm neonates (gestational age, 29.7 +/- 2.3 weeks; birth weight, 1,217 +/- 402 g). We measured total (Vetot) and mechanical (Vemech) minute ventilation, spontaneous (Vtspont) and ventilator supported (Vtmech) tidal volume, transcutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2), transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2), and PCO2, (TcPCO2), mean airway pressure (Paw), phasic esophageal pressure deflections (Pe) as an estimate of inspiratory effort, mean arterial blood pressure (ABP), and beat-to-beat ABP fluctuations. The measurements obtained during conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) were compared with the recordings during SIMV and A/C. To make the measurement conditions comparable and to prevent hyperventilation, peak inspiratory pressure was reduced during the A/C mode so that Vetot remained in the same range as during the IMV mode. Whereas Vetot was similar in all three conditions by study design, Vemech was larger during SIMV and A/C than during IMV. Vtmech increased during SIMV and by study design was smaller during A/C than during IMV. Pe decreased during SIMV and A/C compared with IMV, and Paw was higher during A/C than during IMV or SIMV. Beat-to-beat ABP fluctuations were reduced during SIMV and A/C compared with IMV and showed a close positive correlation with Pe changes. We conclude that SIMV increases Vemech and reduces Pe compared with IMV, resulting in smaller intrathoracic and ABP fluctuations. During A/C, a substantial portion of the spontaneous respiratory effort is shifted to the ventilator, resulting in a further decrease in Pe and ABP fluctuations.
机译:我们研究了同步机械通气的两种方法[同步间歇性强制通气(SIMV)和辅助/控制(A / C)]对通气,气体交换,患者工作量和动脉血压(ABP)波动的影响。 SIMV和A / C以随机顺序应用于12例早产儿(胎龄29.7 +/- 2.3周;出生体重1,217 +/- 402 g)。我们测量了总(Vetot)和机械(Vemech)分钟通气量,自发(Vtspont)和呼吸机支撑(Vtmech)潮气量,经皮氧饱和度(SpO2),经皮PO2(TcPO2)和PCO2(TcPCO2),平均气道压力(Paw),食道相移(Pe)作为吸气量,平均动脉血压(ABP)和逐搏ABP波动的估算值。将常规间歇性强制通气(IMV)期间获得的测量结果与SIMV和A / C期间的记录进行比较。为了使测量条件具有可比性并防止换气过度,在A / C模式下降低了峰值吸气压力,以使Vetot保持在与IMV模式相同的范围内。根据研究设计,Vetot在所有三个条件下均相似,但在SIMV和A / C中,Vemech大于在IMV中。在SIMV期间,Vtmech增加,并且通过研究设计,在A / C期间,Vtmech小于IMV。与IMV相比,SIMV和A / C期间的Pe降低,而A / C期间的Paw高于IMV或SIMV。与IMV相比,SIMV和A / C期间逐搏的ABP波动减小,并且与Pe变化密切相关。我们得出的结论是,与IMV相比,SIMV可增加Vemech并降低Pe,从而导致较小的胸腔和ABP波动。在A / C期间,大部分自发呼吸作用转移到了呼吸机上,从而进一步降低了Pe和ABP的波动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号