...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Predicting alpha, beta and gamma plant diversity from physiognomic and physical indicators as a tool for ecosystem monitoring.
【24h】

Predicting alpha, beta and gamma plant diversity from physiognomic and physical indicators as a tool for ecosystem monitoring.

机译:通过生理和物理指标预测α,β和γ植物的多样性,作为生态系统监测的工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We searched for predictive models for alpha, beta and gamma plant diversity based in easy to measure field indicators. The study was conducted on the upper belt of the Cordoba mountains (Argentina). We established 222 permanent plots of 4x4 m distributed on sites with different physiognomy, topography and management. At each plot we measured physical and physiognomic indicators and recorded the presence of all vascular plants. We estimated alpha diversity as the number of species detected in a plot, beta diversity as the floristic dissimilarity between two plots, and gamma diversity as the number of species detected in a landscape. Through linear regression we found predictive models for alpha and pair-wise beta diversity. Then we analysed if predicted average alpha and beta diversity were good estimators of gamma diversity. We recorded a total of 288 species (5-74 species per plot). Alpha diversity was highest in sites on shallow soils with high structural richness (i.e. high number of cover categories), half covered by lawns, at sunny slopes and rough landscapes (r2=0.66). For beta diversity, the difference between plots in structural richness and in cover of thick tussocks grasses and lawns were the best predictors (r2=0.45). For different sets of simulated landscapes, gamma diversity was well explained by predicted average alpha and beta diversity, plus the sampling effort (r2=0.92). We concluded that using easy to measure field indicators it is possible to estimate plant diversity at different levels with a good accuracy.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.026
机译:我们根据易于测量的田间指标搜索了有关α,β和γ植物多样性的预测模型。该研究是在科尔多瓦山脉(阿根廷)的上带进行的。我们建立了222个4x4 m永久性地块,分布在具有不同地貌,地形和管理方式的地点。在每个小区中,我们测量了物理和生理指标,并记录了所有维管束植物的存在。我们将α多样性估计为在一个样地中检测到的物种数量,将β多样性估计为在两个样地之间的植物区系差异,将γ多样性估计为在景观中检测到的物种数量。通过线性回归,我们发现了阿尔法和成对β多样性的预测模型。然后,我们分析了预测的平均α和β多样性是否是γ多样性的良好估计。我们总共记录了288种(每块地5-74种)。 Alpha多样性在结构丰富度高的土壤(即较高的覆盖类别),一半被草坪覆盖,在阳光明媚的山坡和崎rough的地形( r 2 )上的位置最高= 0.66)。对于β多样性,结构丰富度和浓草丛和草皮的覆盖范围之间的差异是最好的预测因子( r 2 = 0.45)。对于不同的模拟景观集,伽玛多样性可以通过预测的平均阿尔法和贝塔多样性以及采样工作量( r 2 = 0.92)很好地解释。我们得出的结论是,使用易于测量的田间指标可以高精度地估算不同级别的植物多样性。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.026

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号