首页> 外文期刊>Palaios: An International Journal of the Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralogists >HALYSIS HOEG, 1932 IN ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE MOUNDS, TARIM BASIN, NW CHINA
【24h】

HALYSIS HOEG, 1932 IN ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE MOUNDS, TARIM BASIN, NW CHINA

机译:哈里希斯·霍格(Halysis HoEG),1932年在中国西北塔里木盆地的奥陶纪碳酸盐岩中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The calcareous microproblematicum Halysis Hoeg, 1932 occurs in abundance in Ordovician fine-grained, reddish carbonate mounds rich in spar-cemented cavities (Katian, Tarim Basin, NW China). Morphological analysis of Halysis suggests a U-shape skeleton punctually attached to a soft substrate of carbonate sand and silt. The skeletons have a maximum width of 12 mm and consist of laterally branching tubes. The tubes display circular to laterally flattened outlines with a mean diameter similar to 125 mm. The tube walls consist of an inner and an outer layer of microcrystalline calcite, and a central layer of imbricated, radially arranged calcite tablets. An affinity of Halysis with extant siphonous calcareous green algae (Bryopsidales, Udoteaceae) is likely. If correct, Halysis represents a case of a green alga that acquired its skeleton de novo in accordance with sea-water chemistry (low genetic control, low-magnesium calcite, Ordovician calcite sea). Halysis carbonate mounds are low-relief, internally bedded, shallow-water packstone to grainstone banks. Spar-cemented cavities are Halysis-supported shelter cavities (similar to 90%) and depositional cavities (similar to 10%) produced from sediment-laden flows. The mounds formed as part of a shallow-subtidal carbonate ramp dominated by algal-pellet sand sheets. Autocyclic drivers (sand propagation via tides, storms) produced increments of sediment burial followed by episodes of omission and algal growth. These mounds should not be mistaken for "shallow-water carbonate mudmounds" nor for algal framework reefs. In terms of facies, texture, biostratinomy and primary porosity, these mounds are considered a miniature version of bryozoan-rich carbonate banks. Twisted and imbricated aggregates of fronds of Halysis produced shelter cavities making up similar to 5% of the total mound rock volume, thereby reducing accommodation space in sufficient quantity to explain mound formation. A review shows that Halysis presented herein displays the largest and most robust intrageneric growth form compared to occurrences of more basinal settings (Ordovician) as well as much younger carbonate deposits (Silurian to Devonian).
机译:1932年,石灰质微问题的Halysis Hoeg大量出现在奥陶纪的细粒,微红色碳酸盐土丘中,富含石灰质胶结空洞(中国西北塔里木盆地的卡提安)。雾度的形态学分析表明,U型骨架被准时附着在碳酸盐沙子和粉砂的软质基底上。骨架的最大宽度为12毫米,由横向分支管组成。这些管显示圆形到横向扁平的轮廓,平均直径类似于125毫米。管壁由微晶方解石的内层和外层,以及放射状方解石片状的中心层组成。 Halysis与现存的虹吸钙质绿藻(Bryopsidales,Udoteaceae)之间的亲和力很可能。如果正确的话,Halysis代表了一个绿藻的案例,该绿藻根据海水化学(低遗传控制,低镁方解石,奥陶纪方解石海)重新获得了其骨架。碳酸盐岩溶质土丘是浅浮雕,内部层状,浅水堆积岩至粒岩河岸。稀有胶结型腔是由含泥沙的流所产生的,由Halysis支持的掩体型腔(约占90%)和沉积型腔(约占10%)。丘形成为浅潮下碳酸盐岩坡道的一部分,该坡度以藻球砂片为主。自动循环驱动器(通过潮汐,暴风雨传播沙土)导致沉积物埋藏量增加,随后出现遗漏和藻类生长。这些土堆不应该被误认为是“浅水碳酸盐泥土堆”或藻类骨架礁。在相,质地,生物地层学和原始孔隙度方面,这些土丘被认为是富含苔藓虫的碳酸盐岩堤的缩影。 Halysis叶片的扭曲和盘状聚集体产生的庇护腔大约占土墩岩石总体积的5%,从而减少了足够的容纳空间来解释土墩的形成。审查表明,与更多盆地环境(奥陶纪)以及年轻得多的碳酸盐矿床(西陆纪至泥盆纪)相比,本文介绍的雾化作用显示出最大,最稳健的属内生长形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号