...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient education and counseling >Effectiveness of small-group interactive education vs. lecture-based information-only programs on motivation to change and lifestyle behaviours. A prospective controlled trial of rehabilitation inpatients.
【24h】

Effectiveness of small-group interactive education vs. lecture-based information-only programs on motivation to change and lifestyle behaviours. A prospective controlled trial of rehabilitation inpatients.

机译:小组互动教育与基于演讲的信息计划有关改变动机和生活方式的有效性。康复住院患者的前瞻性对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Although patient education may promote motivation to change health behaviours, the most effective method has not yet been determined. METHODS: This prospective, controlled trial compared an interactive, patient-oriented group program with lectures providing only information. We evaluated motivational stages of change and self-reported behaviours in three domains (sports, diet, relaxation) at four times up to one year (60% complete data) among 753 German rehabilitation inpatients (mean age 50 years, 52% male) with orthopaedic (59%) or cardiologic disorders (10%) or diabetes mellitus (31%). RESULTS: We found improvements between baseline and follow up regarding each outcome (p<.001) in both groups. At the end of rehabilitation, participants of the interactive group, as compared to the lectures, showed more advanced motivation regarding diet (p<.10) and sports (p=.006). Interactive group patients reported healthier diets both after 3 months (p=0.013) and 12 months (p=0.047), more relaxation behaviours (p=.029) after 3 months and higher motivation for sports after 12 months (p=.08). CONCLUSIONS: The superior effectiveness of the interactive group was only partly confirmed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This short, 5-session interactive program may not be superior to lectures to induce major sustainable changes in motivation.
机译:目的:尽管患者教育可以促进改变健康行为的动机,但尚未确定最有效的方法。方法:这项前瞻性对照试验将交互式,面向患者的小组计划与仅提供信息的讲座进行了比较。我们评估了753名德国康复住院患者(平均年龄50岁,男性52%)中,在三个领域(运动,饮食,放松)的动机变化阶段和自我报告的行为,这些领域在长达一年的四次(完整数据为60%)下达到骨科(59%)或心脏病(10%)或糖尿病(31%)。结果:我们发现两组基线和随访之间的改善(p <.001)。在康复结束时,与讲座相比,互动小组的参与者在饮食(p <.10)和运动(p = .006)方面表现出更高的动机。互动组患者在3个月后(p = 0.013)和12个月(p = 0.047)均报告了健康的饮食,3个月后更多的放松行为(p = .029),12个月后有较高的运动动机(p = .08) 。结论:互动小组的卓越效果仅部分得到证实。实践意义:这个简短的5课时互动程序可能不如在演讲中引起动机的重大可持续变化的方法优越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号