...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient education and counseling >Complex health care decisions with older patients in general practice: Patient-centeredness and prioritization in consultations following a geriatric assessment
【24h】

Complex health care decisions with older patients in general practice: Patient-centeredness and prioritization in consultations following a geriatric assessment

机译:一般患者中老年患者的复杂医疗保健决策:以患者为中心并在老年评估后的咨询中优先考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To examine to what extent general practitioners in consultations after a geriatric assessment set shared health priorities with older patients experiencing multimorbidity and to what extent this was facilitated through patient-centered behavior. Methods: Observation of consultations embedded in a cluster randomized controlled trial,. 11German Trial Register DKS 00000792. in which 317 patients from 41 general practices received the STEP assessment followed by a care planning consultation with their GPs. GPs in the intervention group used a structured procedure for setting health (care) priorities in contrast to control GPs. A sample of 43 consultations (24 intervention; 19 control) were recorded, transcribed and analyzed with regard to priority setting and patient-centeredness. Results: Patient-centeredness was only moderately apparent in consultations dealing with complex care plans for older patients with multimorbidity. The shared determination of health priorities seemed unusual for both doctors and patients and was rarely practiced, albeit more frequently in intervention consultations. Conclusion: Setting health care priorities with patients experiencing multimorbidity is ethically desirable and medically appropriate. Yet a short structured guide for doctors cannot easily achieve this. Practice implications: More research is needed in regard to handling complex health needs of older patients. It requires a professional approach and training in patient-centered holistic care planning.
机译:目的:检查老年医学评估后的全科医生在多大程度上设定了与患有多发病的老年患者共享的健康优先事项,以及以患者为中心的行为在多大程度上促进了这一点。方法:观察随机分组的随机对照试验中的咨询。 11德国试验登记册DKS00000792。来自41个普通诊所的317名患者接受了STEP评估,然后与他们的GP进行了护理计划咨询。与对照组的GP相比,干预组中的GP使用了结构化的程序来设置健康(护理)优先级。记录,转录和分析关于优先级设置和以患者为中心的43个咨询样本(24个干预; 19个对照)。结果:以患者为中心仅在针对复杂多病患者的复杂护理计划的咨询中较为明显。对于医生和患者来说,共同确定健康优先事项似乎很罕见,尽管在干预会诊中更为频繁,但很少实践。结论:从伦理上讲,在多发病患者中确定医疗保健优先级是合乎需要的,并且在医学上是适当的。然而,针对医生的简短结构化指南无法轻松实现这一目标。实践意义:在处理老年患者的复杂健康需求方面,需要进行更多的研究。它需要专业的方法和以患者为中心的整体护理计划方面的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号