首页> 外文期刊>MDM Policy & Practice >Shared Decision Making in Practice and the Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Video-Recorded Consultations With Patients With Low Health Literacy in the Palliative Phase of Their Disease
【24h】

Shared Decision Making in Practice and the Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on Video-Recorded Consultations With Patients With Low Health Literacy in the Palliative Phase of Their Disease

机译:在实践中分享决策以及卫生保健专业人员对疾病群体核心阶段患者的患者进行视频录制咨询的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. An important goal of palliative care is improving the quality of life of patients and their partners/families. To attain this goal, requirements and preferences of patients need to be discussed, preferably through shared decision making (SDM). This enhances patient autonomy and patient-centeredness, requiring active participation by patients. This is demanding for palliative patients, and even more so for patients with limited health literacy (LHL). This study aimed to examine SDM in practice and assess health care professionals’ perspectives on their own SDM. Methods. An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was used. Video recordings were gathered crosssectionally of palliative care consultations with LHL patients (n = 36) conducted by specialized palliative care clinicians and professionals integrating a palliative approach. The consultations were observed for SDM using the OPTION5 instrument. Potential determinants of SDM were examined using multilevel analysis. Sequentially, stimulated recall interviews were conducted assessing the perspectives of professionals on their SDM (n = 19). Interviews were examined using deductive thematic content analysis. Results. The average SDM score in practice was moderate, varying greatly between professionals, as shown by the multilevel analysis and by varying degrees of perceived patient involvement in SDM mentioned in the interviews. To improve this, professionals recommended 1) continuously discussing all options with patients, 2) allowing time for patients to talk, and 3) using strategic timing for involving patients in SDM. Discussion. The implementation of SDM for people with LHL in palliative care varies in quality and needs improvement. SDM needs to be enhanced in this care domain because decisions are complex and demanding for LHL patients. Future research is needed that focuses on supporting strategies for comprehensible SDM, best practices, and organizational adaptations.
机译:介绍。姑息治疗的一个重要目标是提高患者和合作伙伴/家庭的生活质量。为了实现这一目标,需要讨论患者的要求和偏好,最好是通过共享决策(SDM)。这提高了患者的自主权和患者中心,需要患者积极参与。这需要姑息患者,甚至更具有限的健康识字术(LHL)。本研究旨在在实践中审查SDM并评估自己的SDM的医疗保健专业人员的观点。方法。使用说明性序贯混合方法设计。通过专业姑息治疗临床医生和专业人士整合姑息方法,通过LHL患者(n = 36)横向收集录音录音。使用选项5仪器对SDM观察咨询。使用多级分析检查SDM的潜在决定因素。顺序地,刺激的召回访谈是在SDM上评估专业人员的角度(n = 19)。使用演绎专题内容分析检查采访。结果。实践中的平均SDM得分在专业人员之间的适度,大大变化,如多级分析所示,并通过不同程度的观察患者参与在访谈中提到的SDM。为了改善这一点,专业人士推荐1)连续讨论患者的所有选项,2)允许患者谈论的时间和3)使用涉及患者在SDM中的战略时机。讨论。在姑息治疗中的LHL人员的SDM实施质量和需要改善。在本护理领域需要加强SDM,因为决策是复杂的,对LHL患者苛刻。需要未来的研究,专注于支持可理解的SDM,最佳实践和组织适应的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号