首页> 外文期刊>Palliative & supportive care >Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole in the management of delirium: A comparison of efficacy, safety, and side effects
【24h】

Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole in the management of delirium: A comparison of efficacy, safety, and side effects

机译:氟哌啶醇,利培酮,奥氮平和阿立哌唑治疗ir妄的疗效,安全性和副作用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side-effect profile of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol with that of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole in the management of delirium. Method: The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, and a side-effect rating were recorded at baseline (T1), after 2-3 days (T2), and after 4-7 days (T3). Some 21 cases were case-matched by age, preexisting dementia, and baseline MDAS scores, and subsequently analyzed. Results: The baseline characteristics of the medication groups were not different: The mean age of the patients ranged from 64.0 to 69.6 years, dementia was present in between 23.8 and 28.6%, and baseline MDAS scores were 19.9 (haloperidol), 18.6 (risperidone), 19.4 (olanzapine), and 18.0 (aripiprazole). The doses of medication at T3 were 5.5 mg haloperidol, 1.3 mg risperidone, 7.1 mg olanzapine, and 18.3 mg aripiprazole. Over one week, the decline in MDAS scores between medications was equal, and no differences between individual MDAS scores existed at T2 or T3. After one week, the MDAS scores were 6.8 (haloperidol), 7.1 (risperidone), 11.7 (olanzapine), and 8.3 (aripiprazole). At T2, delirium resolution occurred in 42.9-52.4% of cases and at T3 in 61.9-85.7%; no differences in assessments between medications existed. Recorded side effects were extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) in haloperidol- and risperidone-managed patients (19 and 4.8%, respectively) and sedation with olanzapine (28.6%). Significance of Results: Haloperidol, risperidone, aripiprazole, and olanzapine were equally effective in the management of delirium; however, they differed in terms of their side-effect profile. Extrapyramidal symptoms were most frequently recorded with haloperidol, and sedation occurred most frequently with olanzapine.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较典型抗精神病药物氟哌啶醇与非典型抗精神病药物利培酮,奥氮平和阿立哌唑在of妄治疗中的疗效和副作用。方法:在基线(T1),2-3天(T2)和4-7天后,记录纪念Deli妄评估量表(MDAS),卡诺夫斯基表现状态(KPS)量表和副作用等级。 T3)。通过年龄,既往痴呆和基线MDAS评分对约21例病例进行匹配,然后进行分析。结果:药物组的基线特征没有变化:患者的平均年龄为64.0至69.6岁,痴呆的发生率在23.8至28.6%之间,基线MDAS评分分别为19.9(氟哌啶醇),18.6(利培酮) ,19.4(奥氮平)和18.0(阿立哌唑)。 T3时的药物剂量为5.5毫克氟哌啶醇,1.3毫克利培酮,7.1毫克奥氮平和18.3毫克阿立哌唑。在一周内,药物之间的MDAS分数下降相等,并且在T2或T3时各个MDAS分数之间没有差异。一周后,MDAS评分分别为6.8(氟哌啶醇),7.1(利培酮),11.7(奥氮平)和8.3(阿立哌唑)。在T2时,resolution妄消退发生率在42.9-52.4%,在T3时为61.9-85.7%;药物之间的评估没有差异。记录到的副作用是氟哌啶醇和利培酮治疗的患者的锥体外系症状(EPS)(分别为19和4.8%)和奥氮平镇静(28.6%)。结果的意义:氟哌啶醇,利培酮,阿立哌唑和奥氮平在of妄治疗中同样有效。但是,它们的副作用不同。氟哌啶醇最常记录锥体外系症状,奥氮平最常发生镇静作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号