首页> 外文OA文献 >Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole in the management of delirium: A comparison of efficacy, safety, and side effects
【2h】

Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole in the management of delirium: A comparison of efficacy, safety, and side effects

机译:Haloperidol,Risperidone,Olanzapine和Aripiprazole在谵妄管理中:疗效,安全和副作用的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and side-effect profile of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol with that of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole in the management of delirium. Method: The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, and a side-effect rating were recorded at baseline (T1), after 2-3 days (T2), and after 4-7 days (T3). Some 21 cases were case-matched by age, preexisting dementia, and baseline MDAS scores, and subsequently analyzed. Results: The baseline characteristics of the medication groups were not different: The mean age of the patients ranged from 64.0 to 69.6 years, dementia was present in between 23.8 and 28.6%, and baseline MDAS scores were 19.9 (haloperidol), 18.6 (risperidone), 19.4 (olanzapine), and 18.0 (aripiprazole). The doses of medication at T3 were 5.5 mg haloperidol, 1.3 mg risperidone, 7.1 mg olanzapine, and 18.3 mg aripiprazole. Over one week, the decline in MDAS scores between medications was equal, and no differences between individual MDAS scores existed at T2 or T3. After one week, the MDAS scores were 6.8 (haloperidol), 7.1 (risperidone), 11.7 (olanzapine), and 8.3 (aripiprazole). At T2, delirium resolution occurred in 42.9-52.4% of cases and at T3 in 61.9-85.7%; no differences in assessments between medications existed. Recorded side effects were extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) in haloperidol- and risperidone-managed patients (19 and 4.8%, respectively) and sedation with olanzapine (28.6%). Significance of Results: Haloperidol, risperidone, aripiprazole, and olanzapine were equally effective in the management of delirium; however, they differed in terms of their side-effect profile. Extrapyramidal symptoms were most frequently recorded with haloperidol, and sedation occurred most frequently with olanzapine.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较典型的抗精神病药物,与非典型抗精神病药权,奥沙西滨和AripiPrazole的疗效和副作用谱系进行比较在谵妄管理中。方法:在2-3天(T2)后,在基线(T1)时记录纪念谵妄评估量表(MDA),Karnofsky性能状态(KPS)规模和副作用评级,并在4-7天后( t3)。逐年,预先存在的痴呆和基线MDAS评分,约21例患者匹配,随后分析。结果:药物组的基线特征与:患者的平均年龄范围为64.0至69.6岁,痴呆症介于23.8%和28.6%之间,基线MDAS分数为19.9(Haloperidol),18.6(立妥酮) ,19.4(Olanzapine)和18.0(Aripiprazole)。 T3的药物剂量为5.5mg氟哌啶醇,1.3mg Risperidone,7.1毫克奥氮藻和18.3mg AripiPrazole。一周多,药物之间的MDAS分数的下降相等,并且在T2或T3处存在个体MDAS分数之间的差异。在一周后,MDAS评分为6.8(卤代氟醇),7.1(立培酮),11.7(奥氮藻)和8.3(AripiPrazole)。在T2,谵妄分辨率在42.9-52.4%的病例和T3中发生61.9-85.7%;存在药物之间的评估差异。录制的副作用是氟哌啶醇和立妥酮管理患者(分别为4.8%)的外氮瘤症状(EPS),并与奥氮藻(28.6%)镇静。结果的意义:氟哌啶醇,蓖麻籽酮,阿里哌唑和奥氮滨在谵妄管理方面同样有效;但是,它们在其副作用配置文件方面不同。氟哌啶醇最常记录的外锥瘤症状,并且奥氮翼淀粉最常发生镇静。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号