...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the IASP grading system in patients with chronic non-malignant pain
【24h】

Prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the IASP grading system in patients with chronic non-malignant pain

机译:根据IASP分级系统,在慢性非恶性疼痛患者中神经性疼痛的患病率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of neuropathic pain according to the new International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system. The secondary objective was to compare the system classification of neuropathic pain with the classification of neuropathic pain according to a patient-administered screening questionnaire. Setting: A Multidisciplinary Pain Center. Subjects: One hundred twenty patients with a variety of chronic pain conditions referred to a multidisciplinary pain center. Methods: Consecutively referred patients filled out the PainDETECT Questionnaire before the first consultation. During the first consultation, patients had pain history taken and bedside examination performed by a pain specialist. Patients were classified according to the score on the PainDETECT Questionnaire and graded according to the IASP grading system about the certainty of neuropathic pain. Results: According to the IASP grading system, 22 patients (18.3%) classified as probable or definite neuropathic pain and 90 patients (75%) as unlikely neuropathic pain. According to the PainDETECT Questionnaire, 55 patients (45%) were classified as likely neuropathic pain and 13 patients (10.8%) as unlikely neuropathic pain. Eleven patients (20%) who were classified as neuropathic pain according to PainDETECT were also classified as probable or definite neuropathic pain by the new IASP grading system. Conclusions: According to the new IASP grading system, less than 20% of the patients referred to a multidisciplinary pain center fulfilled the criteria for neuropathic pain. The classification of neuropathic pain with the IASP system varies from the classification of neuropathic pain with the use of a self-administered screening questionnaire.
机译:目的:主要目的是根据新的国际疼痛研究协会(IASP)评分系统确定神经性疼痛的患病率。次要目标是根据患者管理的筛查问卷将神经性疼痛的系统分类与神经性疼痛的分类进行比较。地点:多学科疼痛中心。受试者:120名患有各种慢性疼痛状况的患者被称为多学科疼痛中心。方法:在第一次会诊之前,连续转诊的患者填写PainDETECT问卷。在第一次咨询期间,患者有疼痛史,并由疼痛专家进行了床旁检查。根据PainDETECT问卷上的评分对患者进行分类,并根据IASP评分系统对神经性疼痛的确定性进行评分。结果:根据IASP分级系统,将22例(18.3%)归为可能或确定的神经性疼痛,将90例(75%)归为不太可能的神经性疼痛。根据PainDETECT问卷,将55例患者(45%)归为可能的神经性疼痛,将13例患者(10.8%)归为不太可能的神经性疼痛。根据新的IASP评分系统,根据PainDETECT分类为神经性疼痛的11名患者(20%)也被分类为可能或确定的神经性疼痛。结论:根据新的IASP评分系统,在多学科疼痛中心转诊的患者中,只有不到20%的患者符合神经性疼痛的标准。使用IASP系统对神经性疼痛的分类不同于使用自我管理的筛查问卷对神经性疼痛的分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号