首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review
【24h】

What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review

机译:有什么证据表明慢性腰背痛和软组织综合征中存在神经性疼痛?循证结构化审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: The objectives of this evidence-based review were to review the evidence for whether neuropathic pain (NP) is associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and soft tissue syndromes (STS), and review the reported prevalence percentages for NP within these syndromes. Methods: Of 816 reports, 11 addressed the diagnosis of NP in CLBP and five of NP in STS. Studies were grouped by the method of arrival at an NP diagnosis, e.g., physical examination, type of NP inventory utilized, etc. The reported prevalence of NP was determined by aggregating all the patients in all the studies in each grouping. Similarly, the reported prevalence of NP within CLBP and STS was determined by aggregating all the patients with NP from all the studies in those groups. Each study was independently rated by two raters according to 11 quality criteria generating a quality score. The strength and consistency (SAC) of the evidence represented by each grouping was rated according to Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. Results: In each grouping, 100% of the studies reported some prevalence of NP (none reported zero prevalence). Aggregated NP prevalence for CLBP was 36.6% (SAC level A [consistent multiple studies]) and for STS 41.1% (SAC level A). There was significant variation in prevalence according to the method utilized to diagnose NP. Conclusion: There is consistent evidence by all methods that NP is present in CLBP and STS. Reported prevalence percentages by all methods are substantial. This has significant implications for the treatment of CLBP and STS.
机译:目的:基于证据的审查的目的是审查神经性疼痛(NP)是否与慢性下背痛(CLBP)和软组织综合征(STS)相关的证据,并审查所报告的NP患病率综合症。方法:在816份报告中,有11篇报道了CLBP中NP的诊断,而5篇是STS中的NP的诊断。通过达到NP诊断的方法对研究进行分组,例如,体格检查,使用的NP库存类型等。通过汇总每个组中所有研究中的所有患者来确定所报告的NP患病率。同样,通过汇总来自这些组中所有研究的所有NP患者,可以确定CLBP和STS中NP的报道患病率。每项研究均由两名评估者根据11条产生质量得分的质量标准进行独立评估。每个小组代表的证据的强度和一致性(SAC)是根据美国卫生保健局政策和研究指南评估的。结果:在每个组中,100%的研究报告了NP的患病率(没有报告零患病率)。 CLBP的总NP患病率为36.6%(SAC A级[一致多项研究]),STS的总NP患病率为41.1%(SAC A级)。根据用于诊断NP的方法,患病率存在​​显着差异。结论:所有方法都有一致的证据表明CLBP和STS中存在NP。所有方法报告的患病率都是可观的。这对CLBP和STS的治疗具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号