首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >A novel paracetamol 1,000mg sustained release formulation vs conventional paracetamol 500mg formulation in patients with fever and pain: A randomized noninferiority trial
【24h】

A novel paracetamol 1,000mg sustained release formulation vs conventional paracetamol 500mg formulation in patients with fever and pain: A randomized noninferiority trial

机译:发热和疼痛患者的新型扑热息痛1,000mg缓释制剂与常规扑热息痛500mg制剂:一项非劣效性随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of newly developed paracetamol 1,000mg sustained release (SR) tablets (test product) with conventional paracetamol 500mg tablets (reference product) in patients with fever and pain. Design. An open label, multicentric, comparative, randomized, noninferiority trial. Methodology. Eligible patient, as per predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, were randomized to receive either one tablet of test product twice daily or one tablet of reference product four times a day for 3 consecutive days. Primary efficacy parameter (an antipyretic activity) was measured through recording changes in body temperature while secondary efficacy parameter (an analgesic activity) was measured by recording changes in visual analog scale (VAS) from the baseline. Safety assessment was done by recording adverse drug reactions occurred during treatment period. Analysis of variance was used for the statistical evaluation of data. Results. Of 500 randomized patients, 249 were received paracetamol 1,000mg SR tablets (Group-I), and 247 were received conventional paracetamol 500mg tablets (Group-II). Group-I reported temperature reduction from 101.35±1.23°F to 98.80±0.72°F while temperature reduction in Group-II was from 101.42±1.33°F to 98.9±0.85°F. Group-I reported reduction in mean VAS was from 6.16±2.37 to 1.44±1.70 in comparison to Group-II from 5.97±2.45 to 1.38±1.78. No significant adverse reactions were observed in either group. Conclusion. Both the formulations of paracetamol were clinically and statically equivalent. Paracetamol 1,000mg SR formulation is noninferior to conventional paracetamol 500mg tablets.
机译:目的。为了比较新开发的对乙酰氨基酚1,000mg持续释放(SR)片剂(测试产品)与常规对乙酰氨基酚500mg片剂(参考产品)在发烧和疼痛患者中的疗效和安全性。设计。开放性,多中心,比较,随机,非劣效性试验。方法。根据预定义的入选和排除标准,将符合条件的患者随机分为两组,分别连续两次接受一日两次的受试产品或一日四次的参比产品。通过记录体温的变化来测量主要功效参数(解热活性),而通过记录从基线开始的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的变化来测量次要功效参数(镇痛活性)。通过记录治疗期间发生的药物不良反应来进行安全性评估。方差分析用于数据的统计评估。结果。在500名随机分组的患者中,有249名接受了对乙酰氨基酚1,000mg SR片剂(I组),有247名接受了常规的对乙酰氨基酚500mg SR片剂(II组)。第一组报告的温度从101.35±1.23°F降低到98.80±0.72°F,而第二组报告的温度从101.42±1.33°F降至98.9±0.85°F。与I组相比,I组报告的平均VAS降低从6.16±2.37降至1.44±1.70,而I组则从5.97±2.45降低至1.38±1.78。两组均未观察到明显的不良反应。结论。扑热息痛的两种制剂在临床和静态上均等效。扑热息痛1,000mg SR制剂不逊于常规扑热息痛500mg片剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号