首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Effect of Pregabalin Versus Usual Care in the Treatment of Refractory Neuropathic Pain in Routine Medical Practice in Spain
【24h】

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Effect of Pregabalin Versus Usual Care in the Treatment of Refractory Neuropathic Pain in Routine Medical Practice in Spain

机译:普瑞巴林与常规护理在难治性神经性疼痛治疗中的常规应用成本效果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of pregabalin vs usual care (UC) in outpatients with refractory neuropathic pain (NeP), treated according to routine medical practice in primary care settings in Spain. Methods. Patients were extracted from a 12-week noninterventional prospective study conducted to ascertain the costs of NeP. Pairs of pregabalin-na?ve patients receiving UC or pregabalin, matched by age, gender, pain intensity, and refractory to previous treatment, were selected in a 1:1 ratio. Refractory was considered a patient with actual pain (scoring >40 in a 100mm in a pain visual analog scale) after receiving a course of a standard analgesic, at its recommended doses. Perspectives of the Spanish National Healthcare System and society were included in the analysis. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain. Results of the cost-effectiveness analysis were expressed as an incremental cost per QALY (ICER) gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using bootstrapping techniques was also carried out. Results. A total of 160 pairs were extracted. Compared with UC, pregabalin was associated with significantly higher QALY gain; 0.0374±0.0367 vs 0.0224±0.0313 (P<0.001). Despite drug acquisition costs being higher for pregabalin (?251±125 vs ?104±121; P<0.001), total and health care costs incurred for pregabalin were similar in both groups; ?1,335±1,302 vs ?1,387±1,489 (P=0.587) and ?529±438 vs ?560±672 (P=0.628), respectively, yielding a dominant ICER for both total and health care costs in the base case scenario; 95% confidence intervals, respectively, dominant to ?17,268, and dominant to ?6,508. Sensitivity analysis confirmed results of the basecase scenario. Conclusion. This study showed that pregabalin may be cost-effective in the treatment of refractory NeP patients when compared with UC in routine medical practice in Spain. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目的。本研究的目的是评估普瑞巴林与门诊难治性神经性疼痛(NeP)的成本效益,根据西班牙初级保健机构的常规医疗实践对其进行治疗。方法。从为期12周的非介入性前瞻性研究中提取患者,以确定NeP的费用。选择成对接受UC或pregabalin的初次接受pregabalin的患者,并按年龄,性别,疼痛强度和以前治疗的难治性进行配对,比例为1:1。在接受推荐剂量的标准镇痛剂疗程后,难治性患者被视为患有实际疼痛(在疼痛视觉模拟评分表中,在100mm内评分> 40)。分析中包括西班牙国家医疗保健系统和社会的观点。有效性表示为质量调整生命年(QALY)增长。成本效益分析的结果表示为获得的每QALY(ICER)的增量成本。还使用自举技术进行了概率敏感性分析。结果。总共提取了160对。与UC相比,普瑞巴林与QALY的获得显着更高。 0.0374±0.0367和0.0224±0.0313(P <0.001)。尽管普瑞巴林的药物购置成本较高(?251±125比?104±121; P <0.001),但两组普瑞巴林的总费用和医疗费用相似;在基础情况下,分别为?1,335±1,302对?1,387±1,489(P = 0.587)和?529±438对?560±672(P = 0.628),得出总费用和医疗费用的主导ICER。 95%的置信区间分别为?17,268和?6,508。敏感性分析证实了基本情况的结果。结论。这项研究表明,在西班牙的常规医疗实践中,普瑞巴林在治疗难治性NeP患者中可能比UC更划算。威利期刊有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号