首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Efficacy of mirtazapine for the treatment of fibromyalgia without concomitant depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study in Japan
【24h】

Efficacy of mirtazapine for the treatment of fibromyalgia without concomitant depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study in Japan

机译:米氮平治疗伴有抑郁症的纤维肌痛的疗效:日本一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的IIa期研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia (FM), a parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study was conducted at 57 sites between November 2012 and February 2014. Patients aged 20 to 64 years who met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 diagnostic FM criteria and had stably high pain scores during a placebo run-in period were randomly assigned (1: 1) by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size 4) to receive mirtazapine orally (15 mg/d for 1 week and then 30 mg/d) or matching placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score from baseline to endpoint (week 12 or early discontinuation). Of the 430 patients randomized (n = 215 each group), 422 (n = 211 each group) were analyzed for the primary endpoint. At the study endpoint, mirtazapine caused a significantly greater reduction in the mean NRS pain score compared with placebo (difference, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.17; P = 0.0018). The reduction by mirtazapine remained significantly greater compared with placebo from week 6 onward. More patients treated with mirtazapine had their NRS pain score reduced by >= 30% from baseline (45.5% vs 30.8%). Mirtazapine also improved pain-related quality of life assessed by the Japanese version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and the Short-Form 36 Questionnaire. Adverse events were more common with mirtazapine than placebo (68.8% vs 56.7%), including somnolence (32.1% vs 7.4%), weight gain (17.7% vs 0.9%), and increased appetite (11.6% vs 3.3%). In conclusion, mirtazapine was an effective and safe treatment for Japanese patients with FM.
机译:为了评估米氮平对日本纤维肌痛(FM)患者的疗效和安全性,于2012年11月至2014年2月之间在57个地点进行了一项平行组,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的IIa期研究。符合美国风湿病学会1990年诊断性FM标准且在安慰剂磨合期疼痛评分稳定较高的64岁患者,通过计算机生成的分配顺序(块大小4)随机分配(1:1),以口服米氮平(15毫克/天1周,然后30毫克/天)或相配的安慰剂12周。主要终点是从基线到终点(第12周或早期停药)的平均数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分的变化。在430名随机分组的患者(每组215名)中,分析了422名患者(每组211名)的主要终点。在研究终点,与安慰剂相比,米氮平引起的NRS平均疼痛评分降低幅度更大(差异为0.44; 95%置信区间为-0.72至-0.17; P = 0.0018)。从第6周开始,与安慰剂相比,米氮平的减少幅度仍然更大。接受米氮平治疗的更多患者的NRS疼痛评分比基线降低了> = 30%(45.5%对30.8%)。米氮平还通过日语版的《纤维肌痛影响问卷》和《简式36问卷》评估了疼痛相关的生活质量。米氮平的不良事件比安慰剂更为常见(68.8%vs 56.7%),包括嗜睡(32.1%vs 7.4%),体重增加(17.7%vs 0.9%)和食欲增加(11.6%vs 3.3%)。总之,米氮平对日本FM患者是一种有效而安全的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号