首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Self-management intervention for chronic pain in older adults: A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Self-management intervention for chronic pain in older adults: A randomised controlled trial

机译:老年人慢性疼痛的自我管理干预:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared an outpatient pain self-management (PSM) program, using cognitive-behavioural therapy and exercises, with 2 control conditions in 141 chronic pain patients aged > 65 years. Results immediately posttreatment indicated that relative to the Exercise-Attention Control (EAC) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, mood, unhelpful pain beliefs, and functional reach. The mean effect size for these gains was 0.52 (range: 0.44-0.68). By 1-month follow-up, relative to the EAC group, the PSM group remained better on most measures. At the 1-month follow-up, relative to a Waiting List (usual care) (WL) group, the PSM group was significantly improved on measures of pain distress, disability, and unhelpful pain beliefs. The mean effect size for these variables was 0.69 (range: 0.56-0.83). Relative to the WL group, the EAC group made no significant gains on any of the measured variables. At 1-month follow-up, the mean proportion of reliably improved cases (across outcome variables) was 41% (range: 16-60%) for the PSM group, twice that of those who met this criterion in the 2 control conditions (and this difference was statistically significant). Similarly, significantly more (44%) of the PSM group (vs 22% and 20% for the control groups) achieved a clinically significant improvement on pain disability. In the short term at least, cognitive-behavioural therapy-based PSM was more effective than exercises and usual care.
机译:这项研究比较了141名年龄大于65岁的慢性疼痛患者的门诊疼痛自我管理(PSM)程序,使用认知行为疗法和锻炼以及2种控制条件。治疗后立即得出的结果表明,相对于运动注意控制(EAC)组,PSM组在疼痛困扰,残疾,情绪,无助的疼痛信念和功能范围的测量方面有显着改善。这些增益的平均效应大小为0.52(范围:0.44-0.68)。相对于EAC组,通过1个月的随访,PSM组在大多数措施上仍表现更好。在1个月的随访中,相对于等待列表(常规护理)(WL)组,PSM组在疼痛困扰,残疾和无助的疼痛观念方面得到了显着改善。这些变量的平均效应大小为0.69(范围:0.56-0.83)。相对于WL组,EAC组在任何测量变量上均未获得明显收益。在1个月的随访中,PSM组可靠改善病例的平均比例(跨结果变量)为41%(范围:16-60%),是在2个对照条件下达到此标准的患者的两倍(并且这种差异具有统计学意义)。同样,PSM组中有更多(44%)组(对照组为22%和20%)在疼痛残疾方面取得了临床上的显着改善。至少在短期内,基于认知行为疗法的PSM比锻炼和常规护理更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号