首页> 外文期刊>Pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] >Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the honolulu consensus document.
【24h】

Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the honolulu consensus document.

机译:自身免疫性胰腺炎的组织病理学和临床亚型:檀香山共识文件。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been extensively reported from Japan, Europe and the USA. While the descriptions of AIP from Japan have predominantly been based on the presence of a distinct clinical phenotype, reports from Europe and the USA describe at least 2 histopathologic patterns in patients diagnosed with AIP, namely lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP) or granulocytic epithelial lesion- positive pancreatitis. While the 2 entities share common histopathologic features (periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and peculiar periductal fibrosis), expert pathologists can accurately distinguish them on the basis of other unique histopathologic features. Clinically, the 2 entities have a similar presentation (obstructive jaundice/pancreatic mass and a dramatic response to steroids), but they differ significantly in their demography, serology, involvement of other organs and disease relapse rate. While LPSP is associated with elevation of titers of nonspecific autoantibodies and serum IgG4 levels, IDCP does not have definitive serologic autoimmune markers. All experts agreed that the clinical phenotypes associated with LPSP and IDCP should be nosologically distinguished; however, their terminology was controversial. While most experts agreed that the entities should be referred to as type 1 and type 2 AIP, respectively, others had concerns regarding use of the term 'autoimmune' to describe IDCP. and IAP.
机译:日本,欧洲和美国已广泛报道自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)。尽管日本对AIP的描述主要基于不同临床表型的存在,但欧洲和美国的报告描述了诊断为AIP的患者至少有2种组织病理学模式,即淋巴浆细胞性硬化性胰腺炎(LPSP)和特发性以导管为中心胰腺炎(IDCP)或颗粒细胞上皮病变阳性胰腺炎。虽然这两个实体具有共同的组织病理学特征(导管周围淋巴浆细胞浸润和特殊的导管周围纤维化),但专家病理学家可以根据其他独特的组织病理学特征准确区分它们。临床上,这两个实体的表现相似(阻塞性黄疸/胰腺肿块和对类固醇的剧烈反应),但在人口统计学,血清学,其他器官受累和疾病复发率方面存在显着差异。 LPSP与非特异性自身抗体的滴度升高和血清IgG4水平相关,而IDCP没有确定的血清学自身免疫标记。所有专家都同意,应从语言学上区分与LPSP和IDCP相关的临床表型。但是,他们的术语存在争议。虽然大多数专家都同意应将实体分别称为1型和2型AIP,但其他专家则担心使用“自身免疫”一词来描述IDCP。和IAP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号