首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Biology >50 Years of Inordinate Fondness
【24h】

50 Years of Inordinate Fondness

机译:50年的无依无靠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When theologians inquired whether anything could be concluded about the creator from studying the creation, evolutionary biologist J.B.S. Haldane allegedly replied that the creator must have “an inordinate fondness for beetles”, as there are more kinds of beetles than any other insect. One might similarly conclude that the creator is not particularly fond of the two species of colugo, which are sister to more than 350 primate species (Bininda-Emonds et al. 2007), or the osprey, which is the single sister species to more than a 100 hawks and eagles (Sibley and Ahlquist 1990; Sibley and Monroe 1990). Of course, few evolutionary biologists would endorse the view that numbers of species re?ect the interest of a divine creator, but there is no consensus on an alternative explanation. We can distinguish three broad categories of explanations for distributions of species over taxa: (1) random chance, (2) ecological opportunity, and (3) key innovations of species. All three explanations have garnered substantial support, but none accurately explains distributions of species over taxa by itself. Here we explain how these different explanations can be conceptually combined in a theory that yields accurate predictions of distributions of species over taxa.
机译:当神学家从研究创作中询问是否可以得出关于创作者的任何结论时,进化生物学家J.B.S.据称,霍尔丹回答说,创造者必须“对甲虫有一种过分的爱好”,因为甲虫的种类比其他任何昆虫都要多。可能会得出类似的结论,即创造者并不特别喜欢colugo的两个物种,它们是350多个灵长类物种的姊妹物种(Bininda-Emonds等人,2007),或者是鱼鹰,它是超过200种灵长类的唯一姐妹物种。 a 100鹰和鹰(Sibley and Ahlquist 1990; Sibley and Monroe 1990)。当然,很少有进化生物学家会认可这样一种观点,即物种的数量反映了神圣创造者的兴趣,但是在替代解释上并没有达成共识。我们可以区分三大类解释物种在种群上的分布的解释:(1)随机机会;(2)生态机会;(3)物种的关键创新。所有这三种解释都获得了实质性的支持,但没有一个能够准确地解释物种本身在整个分类单元上的分布。在这里,我们解释了如何将这些不同的解释在理论上组合成一个理论,该理论可以准确预测整个分类单元中物种的分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号