首页> 外文期刊>Sleep & breathing =: Schlaf & Atmung >Diagnostic characteristics of clinical prediction models for obstructive sleep apnea in different clinic populations.
【24h】

Diagnostic characteristics of clinical prediction models for obstructive sleep apnea in different clinic populations.

机译:不同临床人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停临床预测模型的诊断特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: As predictive factors and their diagnostic values are affected by the characteristics of the population studied, clinical prediction model for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may exhibit different diagnostic characteristics in different populations. We aimed to compare the diagnostic characteristics of clinical prediction models developed in two different populations. METHODS: One hundred seventeen consecutive clinic patients (group 1) were evaluated to develop a clinical prediction model for OSA (local model). The diagnostic characteristics of this local model were compared with those of a foreign model by applying both models to another group of 52 patients who were referred to the same clinic (group 2). All patients underwent overnight polysomnography. RESULTS: The local model had an area under receiver operator characteristics curve of 79%. A cutoff of 0.6 was associated with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.9%, 72.5%, 84.5%, and 63.0%, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the local model using data from patients in group 2 were 69.0%, 78.1%, 45.0%, 69.4%, and 56.3%, respectively. The foreign model had an overall diagnostic accuracy of 64.0% when applied to data from patients in group 2. At the optimal cutoff of 17, the foreign model was associated with sensitivity of 38.2%, specificity of 83.3%, NPV of 41.7% and PPV of 81.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical prediction model for OSA derived from a foreign population exhibits markedly different diagnostic characteristics from one that is developed locally, even though the overall accuracy is similar. Our findings challenge the predictive usefulness and the external validity of clinical prediction models.
机译:目的:由于预测因素及其诊断价值受研究人群特征的影响,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的临床预测模型在不同人群中可能表现出不同的诊断特征。我们旨在比较在两个不同人群中开发的临床预测模型的诊断特征。方法:对117例连续的临床患者(第1组)进行评估,以建立OSA的临床预测模型(局部模型)。通过将这两种模型应用于另一组转诊至同一诊所的52位患者,将其与国外模型的诊断特征进行了比较(第2组)。所有患者均进行了夜间多导睡眠监测。结果:本地模型在接收器操作员特征曲线下的面积为79%。临界值0.6与敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为77.9%,72.5%,84.5%和63.0%相关。使用第2组患者的数据,局部模型的总体诊断准确性,敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为69.0%,78.1%,45.0%,69.4%和56.3%。当将外来模型用于第2组患者的数据时,其总体诊断准确度为64.0%。在最佳临界点为17时,外来模型的敏感性为38.2%,特异性为83.3%,NPV为41.7%,PPV占81.3%。结论:来自国外人群的OSA的临床预测模型与本地开发的OSA具有明显不同的诊断特征,即使总体准确性相似。我们的发现挑战了临床预测模型的预测有用性和外部有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号