首页> 外文期刊>Sleep >Moving beyond average values: Assessing the night-to-night instability of sleep and arousal in DSM-IV-TR insomnia subtypes
【24h】

Moving beyond average values: Assessing the night-to-night instability of sleep and arousal in DSM-IV-TR insomnia subtypes

机译:超越平均值:评估DSM-IV-TR失眠亚型的夜间睡眠和唤醒的不稳定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objectives: We explored differences between individuals with DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of primary insomnia (PI) and insomnia related to a mental disorder (IMD) by using serial measurements of self-reported sleep variables (sleep onset latency, SOL; wake after sleep onset, WASO; total sleep time, TST; sleep efficiency, SE), and visual analogue scale ratings of 2 forms of bedtime arousal (cognitive and emotional). Furthermore, we sought to examine the relationship between sleep and arousal within each diagnostic subgroup. Design: Between-group and within-group comparisons. Setting: Duke and Rush University Medical Centers, USA. Participants: One hundred eighty-seven insomnia sufferers (126 women, average age 47.15 years) diagnosed by sleep specialists at 2 sleep centers as PI patients (n = 126) and IMD patients (n = 61). Interventions: N/A Measurements and Results: Multilevel models for sleep measures indicated that IMD displayed significantly more instability across nights in their TST (i.e., larger changes) than did PI patients. With respect to pre-sleep arousal, IMD patients exhibited higher mean levels of emotional arousal, as well as more instability on the nightly ratings of this measure. Within the PI group, correlational analyses revealed a moderate relationship between the 2 arousal variables and SOL (r values 0.29 and 0.26), whereas the corresponding correlations were negligible and statistically nonsignificant in the IMD group. Conclusions: We found a number of differences on nighttime variables between those diagnosed with primary insomnia and those diagnosed with insomnia related to a mental disorder. These differences imply different perpetuating mechanisms involved in their ongoing sleep difficulties. Additionally, they support the categorical distinctiveness and the concurrent validity of these insomnia subtypes.
机译:研究目标:我们通过对自我报告的睡眠变量(睡眠发作潜伏期,SOL;醒后醒来)进行连续测量,探讨了DSM-IV-TR诊断为原发性失眠(PI)和与精神障碍(IMD)相关的失眠的个体之间的差异。睡眠发作WASO;总睡眠时间TST;睡眠效率SE),以及2种就寝时间唤醒(认知和情感)的视觉模拟量表评分。此外,我们试图检查每个诊断亚组内睡眠与唤醒之间的关系。设计:组间和组内比较。地点:美国杜克大学和拉什大学医学中心。参加者:由睡眠专家在两个睡眠中心诊断的187位失眠患者(126名女性,平均年龄47.15岁)为PI患者(n = 126)和IMD患者(n = 61)。干预措施:N / A测量和结果:睡眠测量的多层次模型表明,IMD的TST整夜显示的不稳定性比PI患者高得多(即,变化更大)。关于睡前觉醒,IMD患者表现出更高的平均情绪觉醒水平,并且在此方法的夜间评分上更加不稳定。在PI组中,相关性分析显示2个唤醒变量与SOL之间存在适度的关系(r值分别为0.29和0.26),而在IMD组中,相应的相关性可以忽略不计,并且在统计学上无统计学意义。结论:我们发现诊断为原发性失眠的人与诊断为与精神障碍有关的失眠的人之间夜间变量存在许多差异。这些差异意味着参与其持续睡眠困难的不同持久机制。此外,它们支持这些失眠亚型的独特性和并发有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号