...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Utility and safety of axillo-subclavian venous imaging with carbon dioxide (CO) prior to chronic lead system revisions.
【24h】

Utility and safety of axillo-subclavian venous imaging with carbon dioxide (CO) prior to chronic lead system revisions.

机译:在慢性铅系统修订之前,用二氧化碳(CO)进行腋窝锁骨下静脉成像的实用性和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Prior to attempting placement of one or more electrodes to revise existing rhythm control devices, patency of the central veins should be documented, in view of a high incidence of significant chronic occlusions. Since iodinated contrast venography may be contraindicated in select situations, imaging of the axillo-subclavian venous system with gaseous carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was evaluated prospectively in 23 consecutive individuals who were considered for revision of previously implanted pacemaker or automatic cardioverter defibrillator lead systems. METHODS: Approximately 20 mL of CO(2) were manually infused via CO(2) primed injection tubing into a vein at or above the level of the antecubital fossa ipsilateral to the side of prior lead placements. Digital subtraction imaging over the axillo-subclavian region, lower neck, and mediastinum was performed. Formal interpretation was obtained from one of three interventional radiologists and at least one electrophysiologist. RESULTS: Significant venous occlusions were identified in five (22%) patients. Vascular access utilized for the subsequent 18 revisions performed included the imaged patent ipsilateral vein in 14 patients and the contralateral, right-sided subclavian venous system in three patients. One patient required epicardial left ventricular lead placement. There were no complications from venography. CONCLUSIONS: Axillo-subclavian venography with gaseous CO(2) in patients undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead revisions is feasible and safe when use of iodinated dye is contraindicated. This technique should be employed in patients with azotemia, dye contrast allergies, or significant inflammation in the vicinity of the intravenous line insertion.
机译:背景:鉴于大量慢性阻塞的发生率很高,在尝试放置一个或多个电极以修改现有的节奏控制装置之前,应记录中央静脉的通畅性。由于碘化造影剂在某些情况下可能是禁忌的,因此前瞻性评估了连续23位个体中使用气态二氧化碳(CO(2))的腋窝-锁骨下静脉系统成像的情况,这些患者被考虑用于修订先前植入的起搏器或自动心脏复律除颤器导线系统。方法:大约20毫升的CO(2)通过CO(2)灌注的注射管手动注入到先前铅放置侧同侧肘前窝水平或以上的静脉中。对腋窝-锁骨下区域,下颈部和纵隔进行数字减影成像。正式解释是从三位介入放射科医生和至少一位电生理学家中获得的。结果:在五名(22%)患者中发现了明显的静脉阻塞。随后进行的18次修订所使用的血管通路包括14例患者的成像的同侧专利静脉和3例患者的对侧,右侧锁骨下静脉系统。一名患者需要放置心外膜左心室导线。静脉造影没有并发症。结论:在禁忌使用碘化染料的情况下,对接受起搏器或植入式心脏复律除颤器导线修订的患者进行腋窝锁骨下静脉造影(CO 2)是可行且安全的。对于氮质血症,染料对比过敏或静脉输液管插入附近明显发炎的患者,应使用该技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号