首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Mechanisms of inappropriate defibrillator therapy in a modern cohort of remotely monitored patients
【24h】

Mechanisms of inappropriate defibrillator therapy in a modern cohort of remotely monitored patients

机译:现代远程监测患者队列中不适当的除颤器治疗机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Defibrillator (ICD) technology and monitoring are evolving rapidly. We investigated the mechanisms of inappropriate ICD therapies in a modern cohort of patients followed at our institution via remote monitoring. Methods From September 2009 to March 2011, a total of 2,050 ICD patients (19,600 patient-months) were remotely followed. All events (shocks and antitachycardia pacing) were adjudicated by arrhythmia specialists. Results A total of 249 patients received ICD therapy (34% inappropriate therapy). Inappropriate ICD shocks affected 33 (1.6%) patients. There were a total of 249 inappropriate episodes in 85 patients. Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular association was the predominant mechanism accounting for 133 episodes in 50 patients, followed by atrial fibrillation (97 episodes in 27 patients). T-wave oversensing (16 episodes in five patients), electromagnetic interference (two episodes in two patients), and ectopic beats (one episode in one patient) accounted for a small proportion of events. There were 35 arrhythmic episodes in five patients that could not be classified, all in patients with single-chamber devices. There were no differences in these results by device manufacturer. Conclusions Despite many technological advances, inappropriate ICD shocks still occur but at very low rates and SVT with 1:1 atrioventricular association represents their most common mechanism.
机译:简介除颤器(ICD)技术和监视技术正在迅速发展。我们调查了在现代机构中通过远程监测对现代患者进行不适当的ICD治疗的机制。方法2009年9月至2011年3月,共对2050名ICD患者(19600个患者月)进行了远程随访。所有事件(电击和抗心动过速起搏)均由心律不齐专家裁定。结果共有249例患者接受了ICD治疗(34%不合适的治疗)。不当的ICD休克影响了33名患者(1.6%)。 85例患者中共有249例不适当的发作。房室缔合为1:1的室上性心动过速(SVT)是主要机制,占50例患者的133次发作,其次是房颤(27例患者的97次发作)。 T波过度感应(5例中有16例发作),电磁干扰(2例中有2例发作)和异位搏动(1例中有1例发作)占事件的一小部分。 5例无法分类的患者中有35例心律失常发作,所有这些患者均为单腔室设备。设备制造商的这些结果没有差异。结论尽管有许多技术进步,但不适当的ICD冲击仍会发生,但发生率极低,房室缔合为1:1的SVT是其最常见的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号