...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Primary radiofrequency ablation for incessant idiopathic ventricular tachycardia.
【24h】

Primary radiofrequency ablation for incessant idiopathic ventricular tachycardia.

机译:持续性特发性室性心动过速的主要射频消融。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Fascicular VT and RVOT tachycardia are sometimes difficult to induce by programmed electrical stimulation (PES), despite pharmacologic provocation. In such instances, catheter mapping is hampered and efficacy of catheter ablation is difficult to judge. The study included nine patients who presented with incessant idiopathic VT and were directly taken to the electrophysiological laboratory for RF ablation. During the same period, elective ablation was performed on 108 patients with idiopathic VT. The success rate, procedural and fluoroscopy times number of energies, and the peak temperature were evaluated and compared. Of the nine patients, seven had incessant fascicular VT and two had RVOT tachycardia. The mean VT cycle length was 356 +/- 32 ms and the earliest endocardial activation time during VT was 23.6 +/- 6 ms relative to surface QRS complexes. A fascicular potential was not seen in three of the seven patients with fascicular VT. The mean procedural time was 71 +/- 32 minutes and 144 +/- 40 minutes (P = 0.023) while the fluoroscopy time was 14.6 +/- 4.6 minutes and 30 +/- 16 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively, in the primary ablation and elective groups. The total number of RF energies delivered was 2.0 +/- 1.3 versus 7.4 +/- 5.6 (P = 0.07), respectively. The significantly increased procedural time during elective ablation was largely due to time spent in fascicular VT induction. All patients in the primary ablation group were successfully ablated and none had a recurrence. Primary ablation is a safe and effective option in patients with incessant idiopathic VT. Moreover, in fascicular VT, it is superior to elective ablation in terms of success, fluoroscopy and procedural times.
机译:尽管有药理学上的刺激,有时很难通过程序性电刺激(PES)诱发束状VT和RVOT心动过速。在这种情况下,导管标测受到阻碍,并且导管消融的功效难以判断。该研究包括9例表现为持续性特发性室速的患者,这些患者被直接送至电生理实验室进行射频消融。在同一时期,对108例特发性室速患者进行了选择性消融。评估并比较了成功率,程序和荧光检查次数,能量数量以及峰值温度。在9例患者中,有7例持续性束状室VT和2例RVOT心动过速。相对于表面QRS复合物,平均VT周期长度为356 +/- 32 ms,并且在VT期间最早的心内膜激活时间为23.6 +/- 6 ms。在7例束状VT患者中,有3例未发现束状电位。平均手术时间为71 +/- 32分钟和144 +/- 40分钟(P = 0.023),而透视时间分别为14.6 +/- 4.6分钟和30 +/- 16分钟(P <0.001)。主要的消融和选修组。传送的射频能量总数分别为2.0 +/- 1.3与7.4 +/- 5.6(P = 0.07)。选择性消融期间手术时间的显着增加主要归因于束状室VT诱导所花费的时间。初级消融组的所有患者均成功消融,无一例复发。对于持续性特发性室速患者,原发性消融是一种安全有效的选择。此外,在束状VT中,在成功率,透视检查和手术时间方面,它优于选择性消融。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号