首页> 外文期刊>Steel & Composite Structures: An International Journal >Structural performance of unprotected concrete-filled steel hollow sections in fire: A review and meta-analysis of available test data
【24h】

Structural performance of unprotected concrete-filled steel hollow sections in fire: A review and meta-analysis of available test data

机译:无保护的空心钢管混凝土在火灾中的结构性能:现有测试数据的回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Concrete filled steel hollow structural sections (CFSs) are an efficient, sustainable, and attractive option for both ambient temperature and fire resistance design of columns in multi-storey buildings and are becoming increasingly common in modern construction practice around the world. Whilst the design of these sections at ambient temperatures is reasonably well understood, and models to predict the strength and failure modes of these elements at ambient temperatures correlate well with observations from tests, this appears not to be true in the case of fire resistant design. This paper reviews available data from furnace tests on CFS columns and assesses the statistical confidence in available fire resistance design models/approaches used in North America and Europe. This is done using a meta-analysis comparing the available experimental data from large-scale standard fire tests performed around the world against fire resistance predictions from design codes. It is shown that available design approaches carry a very large uncertainty of prediction, suggesting that they fail to properly account for fundamental aspects of the underlying thermal response and/or structural mechanics during fire. Current North American fire resistance design approaches for CFS columns are shown to be considerably less conservative, on average, than those used in Europe.
机译:钢管混凝土空心结构截面(CFS)是多层建筑中圆柱的环境温度和耐火设计的有效,可持续和有吸引力的选择,并且在世界各地的现代建筑实践中正变得越来越普遍。尽管这些部分在环境温度下的设计已被很好地理解,并且预测这些元素在环境温度下的强度和失效模式的模型与测试的观察结果紧密相关,但在耐火设计的情况下似乎并非如此。本文回顾了在CFS色谱柱上进行的熔炉测试的可用数据,并评估了在北美和欧洲使用的可用耐火设计模型/方法的统计可信度。这是通过荟萃分析完成的,该分析将全球范围内进行的大规模标准耐火试验的可用实验数据与设计规范的耐火性预测进行了比较。结果表明,可用的设计方法具有很大的预测不确定性,这表明它们无法适当考虑火灾期间潜在的热响应和/或结构力学的基本方面。平均而言,目前北美CFS柱的耐火设计方法要比欧洲使用的方法保守得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号