首页> 外文期刊>Subjectivity >Reclusiveness and posthumanist subjectivity
【24h】

Reclusiveness and posthumanist subjectivity

机译:包容性和后人文主义的主观性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What happens if one wishes to affirm reclusiveness at the very time in history when it is physically and pragmatically most difficult to be alone? In such times, what does it mean to be a recluse and to opt out of present and future connectedness? The article briefly reviews strategies and cultures of reclusiveness in history, from anchoritic existences to the enigmatic withdrawals of figures like Maurice Blanchot. It also assesses claims of inescapable panopticism in contemporary social structures. Reference is made to fictional and nonfictional narratives that prefigure the fortunes of reclusiveness in posthuman times. At the same time, however, the article tries to avoid any glib suggestion that reclusiveness is technologically readaptive. Rather, it considers how the natures, cultures and timescapes of aloneness in a futurological age of techno-generalized nodality might help us better understand the atemporal and timeless dimensions of posthumanist subjectivity.
机译:如果一个人希望在历史上那个时候在现实上和现实中最难独处时确认包容性,会发生什么?在这样的时代,成为隐士并选择退出现在和将来的联系意味着什么?这篇文章简要回顾了历史上的隐逸策略和文化,从固定的存在到莫里斯·布兰科特(Maurice Blanchot)等人物的神秘退出。它还评估了当代社会结构中不可避免的全景主义的主张。提到了虚构的和非虚构的叙事,这些叙事预示了后人类时代隐居的命运。但是,与此同时,本文力求避免任何any昧的暗示,即隐性在技术上具有适应性。相反,它考虑了在技术概括性结节的未来派时代,孤独的自然,文化和时空如何帮助我们更好地理解后人文主义主体性的时间和永恒维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号