首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Assessing patient-caregiver communication in cancer - A psychometric validation of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool (CCAT-PF) in a German sample
【24h】

Assessing patient-caregiver communication in cancer - A psychometric validation of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool (CCAT-PF) in a German sample

机译:评估癌症患者与护理人员的交流-在德国样本中对癌症交流评估工具(CCAT-PF)进行的心理计量学验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The recently introduced Cancer Communication Assessment Tool (CCAT-PF) measures congruence in patient-caregiver communication and was initially validated in lung cancer patients. Contributing to a greater proportion of the variance in the conflict scores, primary caregivers were hypothesized to experience greater stress. For a detailed understanding of conflicting communication patterns of cancer-affected families, our study aimed for psychometric validation of the CCAT-PF in a sample covering heterogeneous tumor entities. Methods: Subsequent to a cross-sectional survey of 189 pairs of cancer patients (31% gastrointestinal, 34% lung, and 35% urological) and their caregivers' exploratory factor analysis with principal component condensation and varimax rotation was conducted (response rate, 74.2%). Reliability and construct validity were assessed calculating Cronbach's α and Pearson correlation coefficients for CCAT-P and CCAT-F scales and related constructs, respectively. Results: Cancer-related communication according to the CCAT-PF can be subdivided into four factors including the scales Disclosure, Limitation of treatment, Family involvement in treatment decisions, and Continuing treatment. Reliability ranged from α=.51-.68. The Disclosure scale, describing poor cancer-related communication of the patient, was correlated with patient's distress (QSC-R10: r=.30, p<.0001), unmet needs in several areas (SCNS-SF-34: r=.25-32, p<.001), and negatively with social/family well-being (FACT: r=-0.31, p<.0001). Higher scores on the scale were significantly associated with considerable decrements in emotional well-being especially for caregivers perceiving patients' disclosure as problematic. Conclusions: The Disclosure scale originating from the CCAT-PF emerged as a short, valid, and reliable stand-alone instrument for identifying conflicting communication in patient-caregiver-dyads at risk.
机译:目的:最近推出的癌症交流评估工具(CCAT-PF)可测量患者与护理人员交流中的一致性,并最初在肺癌患者中得到验证。假设主要照顾者承受更大的冲突分数差异,他们承受的压力更大。为了详细了解受癌症影响的家庭的相互冲突的交流方式,我们的研究旨在对涵盖异质性肿瘤实体的样本中的CCAT-PF进行心理计量学验证。方法:在对189对癌症患者(31%的胃肠病,34%的肺病和35%的泌尿科)进行横断面调查后,对他们的护理人员进行探索性因素分析,并进行主成分凝结和varimax旋转(响应率为74.2) %)。通过计算CCAT-P和CCAT-F量表及相关结构的Cronbach'sα和Pearson相关系数,评估了信度和结构效度。结果:根据CCAT-PF进行的与癌症相关的沟通可以细分为四个因素,包括披露量表,治疗限制,家庭参与治疗决策和持续治疗的量表。可靠性范围为α= .51-.68。披露量表描述了患者与癌症相关的不良沟通,与患者的困扰(QSC-R10:r = .30,p <.0001)相关,一些领域的需求未得到满足(SCNS-SF-34:r =)。 25-32,p <.001),而社交/家庭幸福感则为负面(事实:r = -0.31,p <.0001)。量表的较高分数与情绪健康的显着降低显着相关,尤其是对于照顾者来说,将患者的信息披露视为有问题的情况。结论:源自CCAT-PF的披露量表是一种简短,有效且可靠的独立工具,可用于识别处于风险中的患者-护理人员-病历之间的冲突通信。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号