首页> 外文期刊>Surgical and radiologic anatomy : >Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.
【24h】

Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lumbar paraspinal approach by Wiltse: a cadaver study.

机译:Wiltse在腰椎旁入路的一个中线皮肤切口和两个侧切口之间的比较:尸体研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wiltse has described in 1968 an intermuscular lumbar approach with two vertical incisions made at 30 mm each on both sides of the midline. Since 1988, Wiltse recommends to practice a single median incision because of aesthetic arguments and because it avoids potential difficulties in case of iterative surgery. In this paper, the goal of authors was to determine the advantages of two lateral incisions, particularly in term of cutaneous vascularization. This cadaveric study concerned ten specimens. Colored latex was injected into the lumbar segmentary arteries before taking a cutaneous flap. We calculated the mean of the number of vessels injected and cut on the midline, then all the 10 mm on both sides. The goal was to establish a cutaneous cartography, and to determine a zone of less vascular sacrifice. The lumbar skin was vascularized by an arteriolar network which spreads out from the midline. At 30 mm from the midline, the number of cut vessels is statistically less than in the others areas (P < 0.05). At this distance, the small arteries are superficial, fine, and the subcutaneous tissue appears poorly vascularized. The two lateral incisions have the advantage compared to a single median incision of being short, and of allowing a direct access to the muscular plan of cleavage without subcutaneous detachment, with a less pressure retraction. We think that an incision at 30 mm from spinous processes is less noxious for the skin because it is located at the border of two vascular territories, which depend of a median network for one, and a lateral network for the other. These incisions generate technical difficulties, however, when the approach is prolonged with the top of L2/L3, when a lateral and/or central canalar decompression is considered, and finally, in the event of iterative surgery.
机译:威尔特斯(Wiltse)在1968年描述了一种肌间腰椎入路,在中线两侧各形成两个垂直切口,每个切口各30毫米。自1988年以来,Wiltse建议从美学角度出发进行单一正中切口手术,因为这样可以避免在进行迭代手术时可能遇到的困难。在本文中,作者的目的是确定两个侧切口的优势,特别是在皮肤血管形成方面。尸体研究涉及十个标本。在进行皮瓣拍打之前,将彩色乳胶注射到腰段动脉中。我们计算了在中线注入和切割的血管数量的平均值,然后计算了两侧所有10 mm的血管数量。目的是建立皮肤造影,并确定较少的血管牺牲区域。腰部皮肤通过从中线展开的小动脉网络血管化。在距中线30毫米处,切开血管的数量统计上比其他区域少(P <0.05)。在此距离处,小动脉浅而细,皮下组织的血管化较差。与单个中位切口相比,两个侧切口的优点是较短,并且可以直接进入肌肉的解理平面,而无需皮下分离,压力回缩较小。我们认为距棘突30毫米处的切口对皮肤的伤害较小,因为它位于两个血管区域的边界,这两个血管区域取决于一个血管网和另一个血管网。但是,当采用L2 / L3的顶部延长入路时,考虑进行侧管和/或中央管减压时,最后要进行迭代手术时,这些切口会产生技术困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号