首页> 外文期刊>Surgical oncology >Technique and clinical consequences of sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal cancer.
【24h】

Technique and clinical consequences of sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal cancer.

机译:大肠癌前哨淋巴结活检的技术和临床后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a controversial issue. Different detection techniques, various protocols for the histopathological work-up of the SLN and a greatly differing experience between the investigators make the comparison of the available studies problematic. Nevertheless, it is clear, that the successful clinical application of SLNB in breast cancer and melanoma cannot simply be transferred into colorectal cancer treatment. In this paper we try to define the current status of clinical application of this technique in CRC by means of a literature review and our own experience. Moreover, the background and the potential clinical implications of additionally small tumor deposits in the SLN (so-called "upstaging") is critically reviewed. Summarizing the results, it is clear, that the value of SLNB in CRC is still unclear. If current techniques are to be applied outside a study protocol and no patient selection is performed the correct identification of macrometastases needs further investigation. Although still under debate, there is otherwise growing evidence, that -at least if RT-PCR-techniques are used- the detection of small tumor deposits in the SLN may be of prognostic and therefore clinical value. Future studies should focus on two subjects: First, alternative detection techniques and careful patient selection may clarify, if an improvement of the sensitivity to detect macrometastases is feasible. Second, large prospective trials using a standardized histopathological lymph node assessment should compare SLN and Non-SLN for its incidence to bear small tumor deposits. If SLNB proves to be sensitive, the prognostic and predictive value of these additional findings should be clarified.
机译:大肠癌(CRC)的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是一个有争议的问题。不同的检测技术,SLN的组织病理学检查的各种协议以及研究者之间的经验差异很大,使得现有研究的比较存在问题。然而,很明显,SLNB在乳腺癌和黑色素瘤中的成功临床应用不能简单地转移到结直肠癌的治疗中。在本文中,我们试图通过文献综述和我们自己的经验来定义该技术在CRC中的临床应用现状。此外,严格审查了SLN中额外的小肿瘤沉积物的背景和潜在的临床意义(所谓的“升级”)。总结结果,很明显,CRC中SLNB的值仍然不清楚。如果当前的技术要在研究方案之外应用并且没有进行患者选择,则需要进一步研究宏观转移的正确识别。尽管仍在争论中,但是有越来越多的证据表明-至少如果使用RT-PCR技术-检测SLN中的小肿瘤沉积可能具有预后意义,因此具有临床价值。未来的研究应集中在两个主题上:首先,如果可以提高检测宏观转移的敏感性,则可以阐明其他检测技术和仔细的患者选择。第二,使用标准化组织病理学淋巴结评估的大型前瞻性试验应比较SLN和非SLN的发生率,以携带小肿瘤沉积物。如果SLNB被证明是敏感的,则应阐明这些其他发现的预后和预测价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号