...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical innovation >Nonintubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Under Epidural Anesthesia Compared With Conventional Anesthetic Option: A Randomized Control Study
【24h】

Nonintubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Under Epidural Anesthesia Compared With Conventional Anesthetic Option: A Randomized Control Study

机译:硬膜外麻醉下非插管电视胸腔镜手术与常规麻醉相比:随机对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under epidural anesthesia, by comparing with the performance of conventional approaches. Patients and methods. A total of 354 patients (245 men and 109 women) were recruited in this study. The surgical procedures included bullae resection, pulmonary wedge resection, and lobectomy. The anesthetic technique (epidural vs general) was selected randomly. Patients who underwent nonintubated VATS under epidural anesthesia comprised the intervention group, and patients who received VATS under general anesthesia with double lumen tube comprised the control group. Results. In total, 167 patients were included in the intervention group, and 180 patients were included in the control group. The 2 treatment groups of bullae resection showed significant differences in postoperative fasting time, duration of postoperative antibiotic use depending on the time when the white blood cells decreased to normal levels, and duration of postoperative hospital stay (P < .05). Nonintubated VATS is associated with a decreased level of inflammatory cytokines (P < .05). Conclusion. VATS under anesthesia with nontracheal intubation is safe and feasible, and has demonstrated advantages, including shorter postoperative fasting time, shorter duration of antibiotic use, and shorter hospital stay, compared with VATS under general anesthesia with double lumen tube.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是评估硬膜外麻醉下非插管电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)的可行性,安全性和优势,并与常规方法进行比较。患者和方法。这项研究共招募了354名患者(245名男性和109名女性)。外科手术包括大疱切除,肺楔形切除和肺叶切除。随机选择麻醉技术(硬膜外麻醉还是全身麻醉)。硬膜外麻醉下接受非插管VATS的患者为干预组,而双腔管全麻下接受VATS的患者为对照组。结果。干预组总共包括167名患者,对照组包括180名患者。 2个大疱切除术治疗组的术后禁食时间,术后抗生素使用时间(取决于白细胞下降至正常水平的时间)和术后住院时间均存在显着差异(P <.05)。未插管的VATS与炎症细胞因子水平降低相关(P <.05)。结论。与采用双腔管全身麻醉的VATS相比,非气管插管麻醉下的VATS安全可行,并且具有如下优点:术后空腹时间短,抗生素使用时间短,住院时间短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号