...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and total laparoscopic Billroth-I gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a report of short-term outcomes.
【24h】

Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and total laparoscopic Billroth-I gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a report of short-term outcomes.

机译:腹腔镜辅助和全腹腔镜Billroth-I胃癌胃癌切除术的比较:近期疗效报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric cancer have been demonstrated in many clinical studies. Most surgeons prefer laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis rather than total laparoscopic procedures because of the technical difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis. This study assessed the efficacy of total laparoscopic Billroth-I (B-I) gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's experience. We reviewed patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic B-I gastrectomy (n=83) and classified them into laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG; n=41) and total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG; n=42) groups. Short-term surgical variables and outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in gender, mean age, body mass index, or tumor characteristics between the groups. Estimated blood loss was significantly less in TLDG (21.2+/-36.8 g) than in LADG (62.5+/-81.6 g). Anastomotic leakage was not recorded in either group, and there was no difference in the incidence of other postoperative complications. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter for TLDG (10.6+/-2.6 days) than for LADG (12.0+/-3.5 days). Serum C-reactive protein level on day 7 after surgery was significantly lower in TLDG (2.58+/-2.57 mg/ml) than LADG (4.85+/-6.17 mg/ml); however, the level on day 1 or 4 was not significantly different. There was no difference in nutritional status or clinical symptoms during the 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TLDG can be performed safely after appropriate experience with LADG. Our results imply that TLDG may lead to faster recovery, better cosmesis, and improved quality of life in the short-term compared with LADG. Because of the limitations of a retrospective analysis on the study and a patient selection bias, a prospective randomized study should be conducted to reach definitive conclusions.
机译:背景:许多临床研究已经证明了腹腔镜胃切除术治疗早期胃癌的安全性和有效性。由于体内吻合技术上的困难,大多数外科医师更喜欢腹腔镜辅助胃切除术进行体外吻合术,而不是整体腹腔镜手术。这项研究评估了全腹腔镜Billroth-I(B-I)胃切除术的疗效。方法:我们对单个外科医生的经历进行了回顾性分析。我们回顾了接受腹腔镜B-I胃切除术的胃癌患者(n = 83),并将其分为腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG; n = 41)和全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG; n = 42)组。比较两组之间的短期手术变量和结果。结果:两组之间的性别,平均年龄,体重指数或肿瘤特征无差异。 TLDG(21.2 +/- 36.8 g)的估计失血量明显少于LADG(62.5 +/- 81.6 g)的失血量。两组均无吻合口漏,其他术后并发症发生率也无差异。 TLDG(10.6 +/- 2.6天)的术后住院时间短于LADG(12.0 +/- 3.5天)。 TLDG(2.58 +/- 2.57 mg / ml)术后第7天的血清C反应蛋白水平显着低于LADG(4.85 +/- 6.17 mg / ml)。但是,第1天或第4天的水平没有显着差异。术后三个月的营养状况或临床症状无差异。结论:经过适当的LADG经验,可以安全地进行TLDG。我们的结果表明,与LADG相比,TLDG可能在短期内导致更快的恢复,更好的美容和改善的生活质量。由于该研究的回顾性分析的局限性和患者选择的偏倚,应进行前瞻性随机研究以得出明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号