...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical neurology >The effects on prognosis of surgical treatment of hypertensive putaminal hematomas through transsylvian transinsular approach.
【24h】

The effects on prognosis of surgical treatment of hypertensive putaminal hematomas through transsylvian transinsular approach.

机译:经西尔维安经岛静脉入路对高血压性肠壁血肿手术治疗的预后影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive putaminal hematoma (HPH) is a devastating type of stroke that mostly results in death or severe neurologic deficit. There seems to be no general agreement on the selection of treatment modality for individual patients. In this study a comparison has been made between conservative treatment and the results of surgical treatment through the transsylvian transinsular approach of HPH with 30 cc or more. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with 30 cc volume or over of HPH, who were admitted within 36 hours after ictus, have been included in this study. Selection of the patients was made primarily according to the computerized tomography scan (CT) findings on admission. Out of the 66 patients, 47 were operated for hematoma evacuation through transsylvian transinsular approach, and the remaining 19 were accepted as a control group to be treated conservatively after their relatives declined authorization for surgery. All patients' neurologic grades and CT findings on admission were classified according to the hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage grading system, as proposed by the cooperative study in Japan. After 6 months the outcomes of both groups were assessed according to the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). RESULTS: The statistical difference between the mortality rates was considerable (p < 0.05) with ratios of 34% and 63.1% in the surgically and conservatively treated groups, respectively. Good recovery, that is GOS score 5, was not observed in either group. In the group of surgically treated patients, 27.7% was eventually moderately disabled (GOS score 4); whereas this ratio was 5.3% among the conservatively treated group, giving a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that neurologic grades and CT findings on admission are good predictors of outcome, as the grades increase the outcome worsens. Furthermore, ventricular spread of hematoma is not a good prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment via transsylvian transinsular approach of HPH with a volume of 30 cc or more results in improved outcome as compared to conservative treatment. Operation time within the first 36 hours after ictus did not affect the outcome.
机译:目的:高血压性腹泻性血肿(HPH)是一种毁灭性的中风,主要导致死亡或严重的神经功能缺损。对于个别患者的治疗方式选择似乎没有普遍的共识。在这项研究中,比较了保守疗法与通过30 cc或更大的HPH的经跨鞘管穿刺入路的手术治疗结果之间的比较。方法:本研究纳入了60例30 cc或以上HPH的患者,这些患者在发作后36小时内入院。患者的选择主要根据入院时的计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行。在66例患者中,有47例通过经希尔斯维亚静脉输注术进行了血肿疏散手术,其余19例作为对照组,在其亲属拒绝手术许可后接受保守治疗。根据合作研究在日本提出的建议,根据高血压脑出血分级系统对所有患者入院时的神经系统学分级和CT表现进行分类。 6个月后,根据格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)评估两组的结局。结果:手术组和保守治疗组的死亡率之间的统计学差异相当大(p <0.05),分别为34%和63.1%。两组均未观察到良好的恢复,即GOS评分5。在接受外科手术治疗的患者中,有27.7%最终为中度残疾(GOS评分4)。而在保守治疗组中,这一比例为5.3%,差异具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。我们的结果表明,入院时神经系统评分和CT表现是预后的良好预测指标,因为评分增加会恶化预后。此外,血肿的脑室扩散不是一个好的预后因素。结论:与保守治疗相比,经30 cc或更多体积的HPH的经跨鞘管穿刺入路手术治疗可改善预后。发作后头36个小时内的手术时间不影响结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号