...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age.
【24h】

Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age.

机译:60岁以上患者腹腔镜食管肌切开术治疗门失弛缓症的效果极佳。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an esophagomyotomy for dysphagia in elderly patients with achalasia has been questioned. This study was designed to provide an answer. METHODS: A total of 162 consecutive patients with achalasia who had a laparoscopic myotomy and Dor fundoplication and who were available for follow-up interview were divided by age: < 60 years (range, 14-59; 118 patients), and >/= 60 years (range, 60-93; 44 patients). Primary outcome measures were severity of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and chest pain before and after the operation as assessed on a four-point Likert scale, and the need for postoperative dilatation or revisional surgery. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged 64 months. Older patients had less dysphagia (mean score 3.6 vs. 3.9; P < 0.01) and less chest pain (1.0 vs. 1.8; P < 0.01). Regurgitation (3.0 vs. 3.2; P = not significant (NS)) and heartburn (1.6 vs. 2.0, P = NS) were similar. Older patients were no different in degree of esophageal dilation, manometric findings, number of previous pneumatic dilatations, or previous botulinum toxin therapy. None of the older patients had previously had an esophagomyotomy, whereas 14% of younger patients had (P < 0.01). After laparoscopic myotomy, older patients had better relief of dysphagia (mean score 1.0 vs 1.6; P < 0.01), less heartburn (0.8 vs. 1.1; P = 0.03), and less chest pain (0.2 vs. 0.8, P < 0.01). Complication rates were similar. Older patients did not require more postoperative dilatations (22 patients vs. 10 patients; P = 0.7) or revisional surgery for recurrent or persistent symptoms (3 vs. 1 patients; P = 0.6). Satisfaction scores did not differ, and more than 90% of patients in both groups said in retrospect they would have undergone the procedure if they had known beforehand how it would turn out. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review with long follow-up supports laparoscopic esophagomyotomy as first-line therapy in older patients with achalasia. They appeared to benefit even more than younger patients.
机译:背景:对老年门失弛缓症患者进行食管肌切开术治疗吞咽困难的有效性受到质疑。本研究旨在提供答案。方法:共有162例连续性门失弛缓症患者接受腹腔镜肌切开术和Dor胃底折叠术,并且可以接受随访采访,按年龄划分:<60岁(范围:14-59; 118例患者),并且> / = 60年(范围60-93; 44位患者)。主要结局指标是根据四点李克特量表评估的手术前后吞咽困难,反流,烧心和胸痛的严重程度,以及是否需要进行扩张或翻修手术。结果:平均随访64个月。老年患者的吞咽困难较少(平均评分3.6 vs. 3.9; P <0.01),胸痛较少(1.0 vs. 1.8; P <0.01)。反流(3.0 vs. 3.2; P =不显着(NS))和胃灼热(1.6 vs. 2.0,P = NS)相似。老年患者的食管扩张程度,测压结果,先前的气管扩张次数或先前的肉毒杆菌毒素治疗无差异。年龄较大的患者以前均没有食管切开术,而年龄较小的患者中有14%(P <0.01)。腹腔镜肌切开术后,老年患者的吞咽困难缓解程度更好(平均得分1.0 vs 1.6; P <0.01),胃灼热更少(0.8 vs 1.1; P = 0.03),胸痛更少(0.2 vs 0.8,P <0.01) 。并发症发生率相似。老年患者不需要更多的术后扩张术(22例vs. 10例; P = 0.7)或复发或持续症状的修订手术(3例vs. 1例; P = 0.6)。满意度得分没有差异,两组中超过90%的患者回想说,如果他们事先知道结果会怎样,他们将接受该过程。结论:本回顾性研究长期随访,支持腹腔镜食管肌切开术作为老年门失弛缓患者的一线治疗方法。他们似乎比年轻患者受益更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号