首页> 外文期刊>Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques >Laparoscopic Bile Duct Clearance Without Choledochoscopy
【24h】

Laparoscopic Bile Duct Clearance Without Choledochoscopy

机译:无胆道镜的腹腔镜胆管间隙清除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background:Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been proven to be a safe, efficient, and cost-effective option for the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. There are two guiding methods during LCBDE: fluoroscopic or choledochoscopic. Most surgeons prefer the use of flexible choledochoscopy at LCBDE, but it is a fragile, delicate, and expensive instrument. The aim of this work was to report our experience in fluoroscopically guided LCBDE.Patients and Methods:A retrospective review of all patients who underwent LCBDE in the Mansoura Gastroenterology surgical center between March 2007 and September 2014 was performed. Patients with gallstones and concomitant CBD stones were included. After the initial assessment, all patients fulfilling the criteria of enrollment underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and only patients with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography evidence of CBD stones were included. Choledochoscopy was not used in any patient, and we depended on fluoroscopic guidance for CBD stone retrieval in all LCBDE.Results:A total of 290 patients were assessed for LCBDE: 76 patients were excluded; 11 patients were not completed laparoscopically due to negative intraoperative cholangiography (n=7) and conversion to laparotomy (n=4); the remaining 203 patients were analyzed. LCBDE failed in 16 of the 203 (7.9%) cases, with a success rate of 92.1%. The median operative time was 79 minutes, and the median hospital stay was 2.4 days. Complications were bile leakage (n=4), mild pancreatitis (n=2), wound infection (n=2), port hernia (n=1), and internal hemorrhage (n=1).Conclusions:Compared with published studies using choledochoscopy at LCBDE, we found comparable results in terms of the success/failure rate, the morbidity and mortality, the operative time, and the length of hospital stay. LCBDE under fluoroscopic guidance may be as safe and efficient as with choledochoscopic guidance.
机译:背景:腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)已被证明是管理胆总管(CBD)结石的一种安全,有效且具有成本效益的选择。 LCBDE期间有两种引导方法:荧光镜检查或胆道镜检查。大多数外科医师更喜欢在LCBDE上使用柔性胆道镜,但它是一种脆弱,精致且昂贵的仪器。这项工作的目的是报告我们在荧光镜引导下LCBDE方面的经验。患者和方法:对2007年3月至2014年9月间在Mansoura胃肠病外科中心接受LCBDE的所有患者进行了回顾性回顾。包括胆结石和伴有CBD结石的患者。初步评估后,所有符合入组标准的患者均接受了磁共振胰胆管造影检查,仅包括具有磁共振胆管胰管造影或内镜逆行胰胆管造影检查证据的CBD结石患者。所有患者均未使用胆道镜检查,我们在所有LCBDE中均依靠荧光检查指导CBD取石。结果:总共对290名患者进行了LCBDE评估:排除了76例患者。 11例因术中胆道造影检查阴性(n = 7)并转换为剖腹手术(n = 4)而未完成腹腔镜手术;其余203例患者进行了分析。 LCBDE在203例病例中有16例(7.9%)失败,成功率为92.1%。中位手术时间为79分钟,中位住院时间为2.4天。并发症为胆漏(n = 4),轻度胰腺炎(n = 2),伤口感染(n = 2),端口疝(n = 1)和内出血(n = 1)。结论:与已发表的研究比较在LCBDE的胆道镜检查中,我们在成功/失败率,发病率和死亡率,手术时间和住院时间方面发现了可比的结果。荧光镜引导下的LCBDE可能与胆道镜引导下一样安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号